Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe; CHARLITE; WmShirerAdmirer
Sometimes McCarthy has been criticized for not revealing evidence he was using against his accused. Now we know why: some of the evidence came through VENONA, and he didn't want to reveal his source. When Edward R. Murrow claimed that no man could terrorize an entire nation without his help, he should have been talking about Stalin, not McCarthy -- but alas, he was talking about a patriotic American who was doing his best, with excellent evidence (in most cases) to alert his countrymen of an attack from inside. It's too bad that liberals automatically accuse aggressive patriots of excess without being able to prove their accusations. What a difference it would have made if Murrow hadn't launched his incredibly successful attempt to slander McCarthy. For one thing, we could have gone after the most heinous communists in the press and in the universities, as well as Hollywood. Instead they've had 50 years to undermine our unity -- in our children.
64 posted on 07/18/2005 12:14:18 AM PDT by John Filson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fedora

ping for a comment


65 posted on 07/18/2005 2:42:55 AM PDT by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson