1 posted on
07/19/2005 7:51:42 AM PDT by
manny613
To: manny613
Those books are made from recycled paper from all of al franken hillary clintons and bill clintons unsold books
2 posted on
07/19/2005 7:55:03 AM PDT by
al baby
(Father of the Beeber)
To: manny613
Did he write the same thing about the Clinton memoirs?
3 posted on
07/19/2005 7:56:03 AM PDT by
Mrs. Shawnlaw
(Rock beats scissors. Don't run with rocks. NRA)
To: manny613
While bemoaning the destruction of the Dihing-Patkai rainforest, Ms. Spivak said that the Sierra Club was "pulling out all the stops" to keep similar ecological atrocities from occurring in the future: "We are doing everything in our power to keep Bill Clinton from writing another book." LOL! Too bad this is satire, and not the truth!
4 posted on
07/19/2005 7:56:06 AM PDT by
knittnmom
To: manny613
Besides, the rain forests are more useful for hardwood to be used in furniture. They make lousy pulp. Softwood trees like pines from the American continent are much better for paper.
5 posted on
07/19/2005 7:57:55 AM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(I'm sick and tired of being sicked and tired!)
To: manny613
Made a lot of people's money disappear from their wallets as well...
7 posted on
07/19/2005 7:58:56 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
To: manny613
I realize this is satire, but FWIW at the end of the book, the "about the author" section clearly states that the paper in the book contains "no fiber from ancient forests". Also as noted, the silviculture plantings of yellow pine and other pulpwood around the US are far better for paper manufacturing than some gigantic hardwood from south america (now, those redwoods and sequoias, on the other hand...jk)
11 posted on
07/19/2005 8:01:03 AM PDT by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: manny613
Whew! Good thing trees grow back! Plant some walker poplars, those suckers are ready to harvest in 10 years.
To: manny613
(SPOILER) For all you Harry Potter fans, I just want to say this: Dumbledore is the one who dies, he is killed by Professor Snape.
No, I dont know why. I didn't read the book , and I dont intent to dont have the time or the inclination. It was fun posting this info, however
Yes, I am a rotten guy, thank you very much.
16 posted on
07/19/2005 8:11:10 AM PDT by
70times7
(An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
To: manny613
Ar last. Someone with a halfway rational objection to the Potter books
23 posted on
07/19/2005 8:25:13 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(I never read a book before previewing it; it prejudices a man so. - Sydney Smith)
To: manny613
That's bad for the trees. I'm very sorry for those trees. /sarcasm
But what's really bad is that Harry Potter's book draws people into witchcraft.
To: manny613
I don't see why we're using our precious rainforests to print pulp fiction (sorry) when there are better, renewable resources available such as the skins of kittens. But hey, that's just me...
To: manny613
That's why we should use hemp to make paper.
35 posted on
07/19/2005 8:59:56 AM PDT by
sandbar
To: manny613
so the brave little rain forrest gave it's life for the cheerdren...
38 posted on
07/19/2005 9:20:46 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: manny613
44 posted on
07/19/2005 10:22:56 AM PDT by
TChris
("You tweachewous miscweant!" -- Elmer Fudd)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson