Skip to comments.
Senate bill requires illegal immigrants to leave
KPHO ^
Posted on 07/19/2005 6:05:02 PM PDT by Happy2BMe
WASHINGTON A bill introduced today in the U-S Senate would give illegal immigrants up to five years to leave -- before they could return and be in a guest worker program.The sponsors are Senators Jon Kyl of Arizona and John Cornyn of Texas.
The bill faces a July 26th hearing before the Judiciary Committee.
The plan would allow immigrant workers to enter the U-S for two years, followed by a one year break. They could repeat that pattern two more times.
The legislation also increases penalties for employers of undocumented workers and authorizes ten-thousand new agents over five years to investigate employers hiring illegal workers
Immigrants who leave the country within one year would not be fined when applying for re-entry. Those who wait longer to leave would be fined two-thousand dollars for each additional year.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; bordersecurity; borderxxi; bushamnesty; cafta; deport; deportation; fordfoundation; illegal; illegalalien; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; invasionusa; nafta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
The plan would allow immigrant workers to enter the U-S for two years, followed by a one year break. They could repeat that pattern two more times.
1
posted on
07/19/2005 6:05:04 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
To: JohnHuang2; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; dagnabbit; Pro-Bush; ...
Some people believe anything . .
=============================
A bill introduced today in the U-S Senate would give illegal immigrants up to five years to leave -- before they could return and be in a guest worker program.
2
posted on
07/19/2005 6:06:14 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
To: Happy2BMe
I'm just wondering how many kids could be born inside of 5 years and would that change the status of those families?
3
posted on
07/19/2005 6:07:13 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: cripplecreek
4
posted on
07/19/2005 6:09:26 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Pitchforks and Lanters..with a smiley face!)
To: cripplecreek
..easy. 6/7 Kids...W/ One "dropped" @ the border.
5
posted on
07/19/2005 6:12:09 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
To: cripplecreek
6
posted on
07/19/2005 6:17:15 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
To: cripplecreek
Don't care just send them home. In Los Angeles, County, we are up to our armpits with these guys.
7
posted on
07/19/2005 6:19:03 PM PDT
by
television is just wrong
(http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
To: Happy2BMe
No deal unless the anchor baby problem is solved at the same time.
8
posted on
07/19/2005 6:19:17 PM PDT
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: television is just wrong
We're overrun here in Michigan as well. The part that worries me is that many of our illegals are from the mideast.
9
posted on
07/19/2005 6:21:09 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: Happy2BMe
10
posted on
07/19/2005 6:22:42 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
To: Happy2BMe
Naturally they wouldn't have any anchor babies during that time.
11
posted on
07/19/2005 6:22:58 PM PDT
by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: Czar
Simple: The law says, or can be written to say, that no automatic citizenship awarded to any baby simply by being born on US soil. The provision of such automatic citizenship is voided if one or both parents are in a state of federal law violation pertaining to immigration, at the time of birth on US soil.
12
posted on
07/19/2005 6:24:03 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
To: cripplecreek
We're overrun here in Michigan as well. The part that worries me is that many of our illegals are from the mideast.In Alabama, we are dealing with a huge influx of invaders. Some of them are from the Mideast, but the really bothersome ones come from the Northeast, especially New England.....
13
posted on
07/19/2005 6:24:28 PM PDT
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: cripplecreek
Ditto here. We've got them from every corner of the planet here.
14
posted on
07/19/2005 6:25:59 PM PDT
by
television is just wrong
(http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
To: Czar
We aren't enforcing the laws we have now. The bills supporters will say that they intend to hire more border patrol agents but they voted against hiring just about two days ago.
I think they should hire more agents, prove they'll enforce the law and then we can talk about the rest of this stuff.
15
posted on
07/19/2005 6:27:06 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
16
posted on
07/19/2005 6:29:10 PM PDT
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: cripplecreek
18
posted on
07/19/2005 6:30:01 PM PDT
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: DoughtyOne
Main Entry: smoke screen
Function: noun
1 : a screen of smoke to hinder enemy observation of a military force, area, or activity
2 : something designed to obscure, confuse, or mislead
19
posted on
07/19/2005 6:32:20 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
To: cripplecreek; samadams2000; skinkinthegrass; television is just wrong; Czar; DoughtyOne; ...
20
posted on
07/19/2005 6:36:31 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson