Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Image A Little Too Carefully Coordinated (Roberts)
The Washington Post ^ | 7/22/05

Posted on 07/21/2005 11:14:08 PM PDT by kingu

It has been a long time since so much syrupy nostalgia has been in evidence at the White House. But Tuesday night, when President Bush announced his choice for the next associate justice of the Supreme Court, it was hard not to marvel at the 1950s-style tableau vivant that was John Roberts and his family.

There they were -- John, Jane, Josie and Jack -- standing with the president and before the entire country. The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues -- like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers. There was tow-headed Jack -- having freed himself from the controlling grip of his mother -- enjoying a moment in the spotlight dressed in a seersucker suit with short pants and saddle shoes. His sister, Josie, was half-hidden behind her mother's skirt. Her blond pageboy glistened. And she was wearing a yellow dress with a crisp white collar, lace-trimmed anklets and black patent-leather Mary Janes.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: confirmations; drivel; eastereggs; jellybeans; johnroberts; neccowafers; roberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last
Geeze.. What is it with these people? Can't come up with anything to complain about in someone's record, so you start attacking their CLOTHES?

Granted, it was the Style section, but still...

1 posted on 07/21/2005 11:14:09 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingu

Which idiot at the Washington Post wrote that crap?! I noticed they didn't lend their name to it.


2 posted on 07/21/2005 11:17:10 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

They have got nothing, pathetic.


3 posted on 07/21/2005 11:17:12 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("Rommel, you magnificent son of bitch.....I READ YOUR BOOK!! - Gen. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I thought they were a beautiful looking family. Most likely those were the kids Easter outfits.


4 posted on 07/21/2005 11:17:49 PM PDT by pbear8 (Prime Choice is back!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Admit it ... planting that lady out there, lifeless, with her two kids. That was just creepy.


5 posted on 07/21/2005 11:18:26 PM PDT by IRememberElian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

They just can't stand it that someone is being presented to the nation who is just a smart, intelligent, decent person--they have to have overcome a drug habit or a "poor" upbringing (Clinton). The left is OBSESSED with judging people by socio-economic status and gender and race. If Roberts were a poor liberal black woman the Post would be publishing commemorative issues. But the very people who are always saying you shouldn't judge people by their race, gender or the amount of money in the bank account--or "judge" them for having a point of view that doesn't gibe with yours--can never, ever judge anyone by anything else.


6 posted on 07/21/2005 11:18:32 PM PDT by Dr.Hilarious ("My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity."-Joe W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Talk about superficial!


7 posted on 07/21/2005 11:19:21 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Funny how the Washington Post writer of this article bemoans the 50s nostalgia of Judge Robert's family. We all can surmise that the writer longs for the smelly 60s and the shaggy-haired Woodward/Bernstein 70s.


8 posted on 07/21/2005 11:20:08 PM PDT by Vision Thing (As Turner took in the breadth of Murdoch's domain, he wept, for it would never be his to conquer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

This is the weirdest attack article on Roberts I've read yet.


9 posted on 07/21/2005 11:24:20 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbear8

I thought they were beautiful as well.

I suppose leftist sick freaks would rather they dressed in black, chains, and piercings. Or that his "wife" would be a Mr, and the kids sulking and skulking misfits.


10 posted on 07/21/2005 11:25:14 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
We all can surmise that the writer longs for the smelly 60s and the shaggy-haired Woodward/Bernstein 70s.

Likely the author is more into the runways of Milan and Paris than anything so stogy as last week's fashions. Be that as it may, the point of the article wasn't the clothing style, but to mock the candidate for the Supreme Court. Such clothes are far from alien to that building, nor to the guests that visit, so the only reason why it would come up as an issue now is as a thinly veiled attack against him, and if you're going to attack, at least have a good point...

Considering how many cards Hallmark sells each year with that dismal Christmas scene, as the author alludes to, perhaps he or she might notice that Hallmark always sells out of that card.

Guess the people of America are more than comfortable with that image, and the author might want to take a moment or three to integrate that into their brain.
11 posted on 07/21/2005 11:25:15 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingu

This is all they got? Looks like the Roberts confirmation is a sure thing.


12 posted on 07/21/2005 11:25:17 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

It sounded to me like whoever wrote that is jealous.


13 posted on 07/21/2005 11:27:02 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I suppose leftist sick freaks would rather they dressed in black, chains, and piercings. Or that his "wife" would be a Mr, and the kids sulking and skulking misfits.

Don't think kids would be allowed - it would show how the candidate doesn't stand strongly enough behind abortion as they didn't ensure that every kid they had was aborted.
14 posted on 07/21/2005 11:28:35 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingu
They looked wonderful.

So nice to see people dressed up for a change.

I suppose he'd rather see Mrs. Roberts in a black pants suit and pink blouse.

15 posted on 07/21/2005 11:29:37 PM PDT by Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
This is all they got? Looks like the Roberts confirmation is a sure thing.

The shorts selected for Jack Jr. suggest EVIL tendencies on the part of Judge John Roberts!!!!!

EVILLLLLLLLLLL

16 posted on 07/21/2005 11:32:45 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
...There they were -- John, Jane, Josie and Jack -- standing with the president and before the entire country. The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues -- like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers...

Ugh... MEGA Barf Alert on this one. You have to read this drivel for yourself to believe it's for real...

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

17 posted on 07/21/2005 11:34:25 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues -- like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers.

You. Have. Got. To. Be. Kidding. Me.

I do not have an overly high opinion of junior college newspapers in this country but I would hesitate to accuse any one of them of publishing something this insipid. Condescension is generally a two-edged sword, but when employed in this plodding, ham-handed fashion it only cuts the wielder.

18 posted on 07/21/2005 11:34:28 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

The fact that the "style" page can do nothing but attack people who attempt to dress properly for one of the more important events that can occur in one's life--meeting the President of the United States who is nominating you for the Supreme Court--shows how messed up the liberal elite in this country are.


19 posted on 07/21/2005 11:34:29 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; NautiNurse; Howlin; Mia T

Beyond belief ping...


20 posted on 07/21/2005 11:35:11 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson