Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Coopster

I would suggest that Reagan wasn't talking about pollen. If he had been, he wouldn't have qualified his comments about 'some trees'. He would have said all trees.

As for the pollen count, the inclusion of it in the daily index reporting doesn't make it pollution. It does make it bothersome for people with allergies, which is why they report it.

Thanks for the additional comments.


19 posted on 07/28/2005 8:07:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

That's fine about Reagan. As I stated, I don't remember.

But - with all due respect, Google the simple question "Is pollen considered pollution?", and see what you get.

Pollen IS part of pollution, it's just not man-made.

And it's WAY more than "bothersome" for a lot of people.


25 posted on 07/29/2005 4:50:48 AM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson