Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Hot Spot' fish areas being depleted; research shows ocean diversity declining
Globe and Mail ^ | July 29, 2005 | Mark Hume

Posted on 07/29/2005 9:54:58 AM PDT by cogitator

New research by a Canadian university has brought previously unknown parts of the world's oceans into focus and is raising new concerns about the global decline of big species.

The study, released yesterday by the journal Science, found that the ocean contains a small number of "hot spots" where marine life concentrates and where stocks are declining dramatically.

But the finding has also opened a new window of hope because it points to a few key areas, in a vast, featureless ocean, where conservation efforts could be targeted for maximum effect.

By looking at 50 years of international fishing data for tuna and billfish, co-authors Boris Worm and Ransom Myers, both of Dalhousie University in Halifax, were able to map five hot spots of species richness and density in the world's oceans.

These zones of concentration are clustered mostly in the subtropics where ocean temperatures, currents, oxygen concentration and food sources converge, drawing in the bigger predator species.

The five different hot spots are off the coast of Florida, off Australia's east coast, south of the Hawaiian Islands, east of Sri Lanka and in the southeastern Pacific.

"The open ocean covers two-thirds of the planet and people usually envision it as a big, blue area on the map, where you see life only when you come close to the coastal rims," Dr. Worm said in a telephone interview.

"That's certainly not true. We've shown that the species that you find in the open ocean, like tuna and billfish, sharks and turtles, they appear to aggregate in certain areas, we call hot spots."

Dr. Worm said that two years ago he and Dr. Myers noticed areas of richness in the northwest Atlantic, off Canada's East Coast.

They wondered if that was a phenomenon they would find in other places.

Using decades of fishing data collected by commercial fishing fleets that were roaming globally, they were able to zero in on the five areas "of great global importance" that they are now calling hot spots.

"The second thing that astounded us was when we looked back in time, 50 years, using a unique global long lining data set collected by the Japanese fleet, was that those hot spots are the remnants of much larger areas," Dr. Worm said.

He said the five hot spots are shrinking, species diversity within them has declined by 50 per cent, and other hot spots that once existed have vanished, apparently because of overfishing .

"We could not identify a factor other than fishing that may plausibly explain long-term, global-scale declines," the researchers state in their paper.

"It's like a slow-motion disaster," Dr. Worm said of what is happening to fish stocks in the world's oceans.

"You know, a silent catastrophe which is beyond our reach because we can't really see it."

Dr. Worm said he hopes the discovery of hot spots will now help the public focus on the plight of the world's oceans.

"What we're trying to do with this idea of global hot spots is bring it to people's imaginations in a similar way that rain forests and coral reefs are," he said.

He said his findings were presented to the United Nations recently and he was encouraged by how interested fisheries experts were in the hot-spot data.

"They have a clearly defined goal to put high-seas marine parks into place. They just don't know where to put them. This points the way.

"This says . . . if you act now you can do something for our common global heritage . . . It is a hopeful message after all. Some areas are still there."

In addition to finding that big fish such as tuna aggregate in key areas, the researchers also discovered that zooplankton concentrates in specific zones.

Dr. Worm said that new zooplankton discovery came as a shock.

"Well, this was an amazing surprise to us . . . These are the tiniest animals in the ocean," he said.

"They are single-celled organisms, related to amoeba. They have nothing to do with large tuna and billfish we studied in the first place - and yet they showed the same patterns of diversity . . . So that tells us there are some very general features in the oceans that make certain places extremely interesting to a wide range of species."

He said it's vital to protect those areas while they still have high biodiversity.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conservation; consumption; diversity; fish; fisheries; hotspots; overfishing
This got picked up by a lot of outlets; search Google News on "fish". Or see if this works:

Google News Search results

1 posted on 07/29/2005 9:54:58 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator

"He said the five hot spots are shrinking, species diversity within them has declined by 50 per cent, and other hot spots that once existed have vanished, apparently because of overfishing"

Couldn't be because many worldwide industries use the ocean as a huge garbage dump for all kinds of waste, including chemical, could it? Nahhhhhh.


2 posted on 07/29/2005 10:00:07 AM PDT by FearNoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Soilent Green is people! It's made out of people!
3 posted on 07/29/2005 10:01:38 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984

Hey that's my tagline


4 posted on 07/29/2005 10:02:04 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent Green is People!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Perhaps if they offer the less common fish preferences and scholorships?
susie


5 posted on 07/29/2005 10:02:12 AM PDT by brytlea (All you need as ID to vote in FL is your Costco card...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
In the book "Rainbow Fish" there is diversity -- Rainbow Fish has beautiful scales and the other fish do not. So he is shunned and everyone refuses to play with him. Because he is different.

But Rainbow Fish becomes enlightened. He learns that being different is bad. So, he gives away his pretty scales. This redistribution of scales means that soon, every fish has one beautiful scale. Including Rainbow Fish. That way, the nasty diversity is stomped out and everyone is equal -- true, there's no real beauty or individuality any more, but at least all the fish are equal.

This book is very popular with the Leftists. Because, while diversity is nice, Marxism is better.

6 posted on 07/29/2005 10:12:40 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

?yep.....'Hot Spot' fish areas being depleted; research shows ocean diversity declining 'Hot Spot' fish areas being depleted;........MORE NUCLEAR PROBLEMS?


7 posted on 07/29/2005 10:30:08 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
"He said the five hot spots are shrinking, species diversity within them has declined by 50 per cent, and other hot spots that once existed have vanished, apparently because of overfishing"

If we still hunted and gathered on land as we do in the ocean, we would all be starving to death. It makes sense to expand fish farming instead of depleting natural stocks. But wait - environmentalists, having once recommended exctly that, have now done one of their famous El Reversos and come out against fish farming.

8 posted on 07/29/2005 10:51:29 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
If we still hunted and gathered on land as we do in the ocean, we would all be starving to death. It makes sense to expand fish farming instead of depleting natural stocks. But wait - environmentalists, having once recommended exctly that, have now done one of their famous El Reversos and come out against fish farming.

Exactly. And where there are no property rights—where everything is held in common—we can expect rapid depletion of resources.

9 posted on 07/29/2005 11:04:03 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
Fish farming can be done a number of ways. Hatcheries, which release fry to the wild, may be more ecologically "friendly" than full-scale farms. I think that fish farming is to oceans fisheries what nuclear power is to the coming energy crunch -- the only way to get from A to B without major disruptions. Just as nuclear power can be implemented cleanly and efficiently and relatively safely, fish farming can be viable, too. The real clear lesson is that unmanaged fishing of wild fish stocks is seriously affecting the oceans -- and not in a good way.

This is a decent article highlighting the problems of fish farming, but also noting that it's possible to do it in ways that aren't significantly harmful to the environment:

Is Fish Farming Safe?

One of the main problems is fish meal -- if you deplete the oceans of little fish to feed the big fish on the farms, you still haven't helped the oceans appreciably. Essentially, you'd need to feed the fish on vegetable protein, and it might not taste quite the same.

10 posted on 07/29/2005 11:14:39 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson