No doubt the reporter was confused. Helen said she was "ranting", and, of course, she is always "ranting", nonstop, 24/7.
Hee-Hee
This ole cave woman just has to stay out of sight.
Oh my ... he leaked it! This calls for an investigation ... Karl Rove must've put Eisele up to this in order to embarrass Thomas .......
Poor old Helen Thomas!
The talentless and witless slanderous hag Helen Thomas didn't cite Cheney's lies to justify her slanderous accusation that he is a "liar". You know, slanderous Helen was a prostitute before her early cub reporter days, and the MSM dare not afford another whithering prostitute aka "columnist" or "anchor" who willy-nilly slanders. So far, the most infamous American politician liar is convicted perjurer Bill Clinton. Whereas, Hillary Clinton is so duplicitious she is a synthesized personification of the Hydra and Janus.
What I ask: Does anyone trust that Helen Thomas has a sound enough mind to be objective and credible? Isn't it too precarious for the uninformed among ciitzens to believe SHE comprehends what is TRUTH and knows what are FACTS?
What responsible person would bother with Helen Thomas except to unload dibbles and drabs of gossip and insinuations to bloat her high-toxicity opine?
"Liberals", like rant-rag writer Helen Thomas, inflate their hypocrisy every time they go into automatic ad hominem mode and call everyone they oppose a "liar." Obviously, transparent ad hominem ploys betray their arrested adolescence. Ill-liberal Freudian projectionists, like Dean, Gore and Durbin, et al, emit shrills echoing fascists' hystrionic "hate speech." Reminds me of script possibilities for a sequel to the broadway play & movie success THE PRODUCERS. A parody of the Democrat party bedlam: its leftist/pseudo-liberal factions in ad hominem chorus is easy work, and it ain't even fiction although outrageous.
I do wonder if ANYONE reads Helen Thomas? She is so very insignificant and certainly an obnoxious wart.
"We were just talking -- I was ranting -- and he wrote about it. That isn't right. We all say stuff we don't want printed," Thomas said.
Somehow I doubt the old hag has any right to complain. My guess is that she has done the same thing to many people in her long and pathetic career.
She has the old person's disease: she thinks that she is now free to say what she thinks, a kind of reversion to teen-age.
I wonder how many things she has printed that someone didn't want other people to hear?