Posted on 08/02/2005 8:19:58 AM PDT by Heebert
IN Niger most of the 11 million people live on a dollar a day. Some 40% of children are underfed, and one out of four dies before turning five.
And that’s when things are normal. Throw in a plague of locusts, and a familiar spectacle emerges: skeletal babies, distended bellies, people too famished to brush the flies from their faces.
To the aid workers charged with saving the dying, the immediate challenge is to raise relief money and get supplies to the stricken areas.
They leave it to the economists and politicians to come up with a lasting remedy. One such economist is James Shikwati who blames foreign aid.
“When aid money keeps coming, all our policy-makers do is strategise on how to get more,” said the Kenya-based director of the Inter Region Economic Network think tank.
“They forget about getting their own people working to solve these very basic problems. In Africa, we look to outsiders to solve our problems, making the victim not take responsibility to change.”
Moving the aid can be a nightmare in itself. Africa’s good roads are few, and often pass through the front lines of civil wars. But Mr Shikwati notes an additional problem - even African countries that have food to spare can’t easily share it. Tariffs on agricultural products within sub-Saharan Africa average as high as 33%, compared with 12% on similar products imported from Europe.
“It doesn’t make sense when they can’t even allow their neighbours to feed them. They have to wait for others in Europe or Asia to help.
“We don’t have any excuses in Africa. We can’t blame nature. We have to tell our leadership to open up and get people producing food.”
Nature, of course, does bear some of the blame. Recurring drought is a part of life in Africa. Farmers have learned to cope, but exploding population growth sucks up water, pasture and livestock.
Many food crises result from bad government and civil wars. For 30 years after winning independence from France, Niger was ruled by coup and military dictatorship. Now it’s a peaceful multi-party democracy, but its desert is getting bigger.
All it took was the locust swarms of a year ago, the worst in 15 years, to start tipping Niger over the edge. The insects ravaged some 7,000 square miles of Niger’s farmland. The combined drought-locust onslaught cut cereal production by 15% last year.
At first, few noticed. Places like Niger “were never on anybody’s radar screen. They’re not considered important, geopolitically or resource-wise,” said Cathy Skoula, executive director of US-based Action Against Hunger.
Aid groups say Niger’s catastrophe could have been averted - that early warning systems were in place, and the UN and other humanitarian agencies warned of imminent food shortages late last year.
In November, Niger’s government issued an emergency appeal for 78,000 tonnes of food. Donors, busy with higher-profile crises, barely responded.
The following month came the Indian Ocean tsunami that entirely eclipsed Africa’s misery on the world’s TV screens.
Aid workers say heading off famine needs long-term, steady funding.
“Prevention doesn’t sell that much,” said Stefanie Savariaud, spokeswoman for the UN World Food Programme in Niger’s capital, Niamey. “The world has to wait for images of dying children to react.”
Ironically, only three weeks ago the world’s attention was fixed on Africa again, when the G8 summit pledged to double African aid to $50 billion ($41bn) and granted 18 of its countries debt forgiveness, including Niger.
A week later, TV pictures of hungry people began beaming out of Niger, and donors reached for their wallets. But the World Food Programme has only raised $9m of the $16m (€13m) it appealed for.
At a feeding centre in Mada Roufa, in eastern Niger, Mai Sali, of Doctors Without Borders, praised those efforts, but agreed crisis aid was not the answer.
“We need to find other long-term solutions. We can’t just address emergencies,” he said.
The country is rich in natural resources. Those resources are benefiting the FEW and the rest of the people are languishing.
"...it's the utter corruption of it's leaders that are to blame for the pitiful condition of SOME of Niger's citizens."
Africans are to blame for Africa's misery. Corruption is endemic across nation after nation on that continent. Aid is simply the asprin that cures the headache - after all the proper people get their cut of the action, of course. You are right to state that the few are benefitting at the expense of others.
Food for thought. Same idea, different story.
A must read:
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,363663,00.html
http://roostercashews.blogspot.com/2005/07/holy-crap-i-just-found-my-twin-and-hes.html
Niger is blessed with many natural resources. And cursed with corrupt leaders.
"Niger is blessed with many natural resources. And cursed with corrupt leaders."
Except water.
I work with a guy from Ghana and he is so glad to be an American every day of his life. Ghana is a relatively "successful" African country, at least it was in years past, but it too is plagued by corruption and an untouchable ruling class.
Sad because Niger, Ghana, et all. do not have to suffer as they are.
The problem is well-known to international agencies that provide money and other aid to Africa. They are especially aware of gov't corruption in Africa and are getting into state-building theory. It is unknown territory, and any contributions to thinking in that area are welcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.