Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Green For Launch
Investors business daily ^ | 8/02/05

Posted on 08/02/2005 3:29:16 PM PDT by rang1995

Green For Launch Political Correctness: After 2 1/2 years and $1.4 billion spent to make the space shuttle safer, the same problem that doomed Columbia now plagues Discovery. Has environmentalism doomed the shuttle program?

After the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated upon re-entry in 2003, a scathing report by the Columbia Accident Investigating Board noted the contributions NASA's "organization and culture" made to the shuttle disaster.

But the root cause for both the disintegration of the shuttle Columbia due to thermal tiles damaged by chunks of insulating foam falling off the large external fuel tank, the earlier loss of Challenger, and the repetition of the foam problem with Discovery, may be the decision imposed on NASA to use parts and materials that were more environmentally friendly.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environmental; nasa; shuttle; tiles
WOW!!!
1 posted on 08/02/2005 3:29:19 PM PDT by rang1995
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rang1995

Finally!


2 posted on 08/02/2005 3:30:49 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

Environmentally friendly - yes.

Shuttle/people friendly - no.


3 posted on 08/02/2005 3:32:14 PM PDT by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

Mark Levin just read pieces of this article on his show. You'll never see it on CNN, though.


4 posted on 08/02/2005 3:35:34 PM PDT by DefiantZERO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

I am a bit curious about how we know that the old foam was safer.


5 posted on 08/02/2005 3:37:31 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

i guess the amount of cracks after compared to before the new foam..probably extrapalated after the columbia accident


6 posted on 08/02/2005 3:42:14 PM PDT by rang1995 (They will love us when we win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Did this graphic come through, or do you have to be a subscriber to see it?

7 posted on 08/02/2005 3:44:11 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

I'm sure they did some testing but it wouldn't be easy to replicate the conditions that cause the foam to come off. I guess I'm just wondering if we may be seeing more because there are more cameras watching.


8 posted on 08/02/2005 3:46:51 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Interesting concentration of hits around the external fuel tank attatchments.


9 posted on 08/02/2005 3:48:47 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Note the increase in the number of hits that started in mid-97 (chart on left side of graphic). That's the cut-in point for the new Enviro-friendly process for applying the insulation.


10 posted on 08/02/2005 3:50:36 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

That's the sort of evidence I was looking for.


11 posted on 08/02/2005 3:53:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

yes


12 posted on 08/02/2005 3:54:24 PM PDT by rang1995 (They will love us when we win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rang1995

It's about time the LSM started to pick this story up. What do we have to do, FORCE FEED it to them?


13 posted on 08/02/2005 4:14:57 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Chech this link

Shuttle Foam Loss Linked to EPA Regs

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1452415/posts?page=25#25


14 posted on 08/02/2005 4:25:23 PM PDT by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

or you could check it instead ;)


15 posted on 08/02/2005 4:35:21 PM PDT by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rang1995
Exploding and disintegrating space shuttles can damage the environment too.

Bada bing.
16 posted on 08/02/2005 4:51:04 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson