1 posted on
08/04/2005 1:38:39 PM PDT by
Asphalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Asphalt
The appearance-challenged? What the heck does that even MEAN?!
2 posted on
08/04/2005 1:40:15 PM PDT by
Hadean
To: Asphalt
So does this mean that we have to question whether Hillary really is the smartest woman in America?
3 posted on
08/04/2005 1:40:48 PM PDT by
saveliberty
(NYT= all that money and no class)
To: Asphalt
speaking of Maureen Dowd and the appearance challenged.....
4 posted on
08/04/2005 1:40:52 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: Asphalt
The best looking strippers get more of my dollar bills. That's all I know.
5 posted on
08/04/2005 1:41:02 PM PDT by
TheBigB
(I would like to extend to you an invitation to the pants party.)
To: Asphalt
The Ugliness Problem- Is it irrational to discriminate against the appearance-challenged? I don't know you tell me
6 posted on
08/04/2005 1:41:37 PM PDT by
JimWforBush
(Alcohol - For the best times you'll never remember)
To: Asphalt
Heck, I'd vote for these two beauties for President and Vice-President!
7 posted on
08/04/2005 1:41:40 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Asphalt
After a while you just get used to it....... trust me.
10 posted on
08/04/2005 1:42:30 PM PDT by
day10
(Rules cannot substitute for character.)
To: Asphalt
APPEARANCE CHALLENGED!!!!!!!!!!!! Excuse me while I yak...................again.
All this political correctness is making me ill.
11 posted on
08/04/2005 1:42:38 PM PDT by
diamond6
(Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
To: Asphalt; Darksheare; Tijeras_Slim; Lazamataz; Owl_Eagle; pissant; Dashing Dasher; ...
If they have "Be Nice To The Ugly Week" I some recognition!
12 posted on
08/04/2005 1:43:00 PM PDT by
Jersey Republican Biker Chick
(People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
To: Asphalt
...in a recent conversation with Hamermesh I discovered that he is sympathetic to ugly people who want laws to bar the discrimination. Just for reference purposes:
15 posted on
08/04/2005 1:43:45 PM PDT by
untenured
(http://futureuncertain.blogspot.com)
To: Asphalt
To: Asphalt
Hey, I'm ugly as the north end of a south-bound mule but it never hurt my work.
But then I was a Marine and in that type of work ugliness is probably an asset.
17 posted on
08/04/2005 1:43:59 PM PDT by
An Old Marine
(Freedom isn't Free)
To: Asphalt
Irrational? Not at all.
Un-PC? definitely.
So we probably need a law againt it.
21 posted on
08/04/2005 1:45:23 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: Asphalt
LOL!!!
Perhaps I should take two pics of myself.. one with my military BC glasses on, and one with my regular frames..
24 posted on
08/04/2005 1:48:25 PM PDT by
Darksheare
("Just because I have a paper heart, doesn't mean tearing it is okay." -The man with the candy face)
To: Asphalt
Interesting study found that the closer a person's facial features matched this overlay graph, the more attractive they were perceived to be.
25 posted on
08/04/2005 1:49:10 PM PDT by
martin_fierro
(Buzzin' on Birfday Cake)
To: Asphalt
If I continue to scroll down, will there be a picture of Helen Thomas? LOL
26 posted on
08/04/2005 1:49:15 PM PDT by
mlc9852
To: Asphalt
The family founders, in 18th-century Frankfurt, were supremely ugly, but several generations later, after successive marriages to supremely beautiful women, the men in the family were indistinguishable from movie stars.This isn't exactly something that buttresses Seligman's already-fishy argument. There are a number of web sites (to say nothing of the supermarket tabloids like the Enquirer and Star) that routinely publish photos of movie and TV stars without the $1000 makeup jobs or professionally-Photoshopped pictures, and suffice it to say that a very large number of them are no more attractive in real life than anyone else you might pick randomly off the street ... and a sizable minority are downright unappealing.
To: Asphalt
"...New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, concludes that less attractive children are discriminated against by their own parents...."
Too many potential smart-aleky comments to choose from.
39 posted on
08/04/2005 1:53:41 PM PDT by
mad puppy
( "He's with me!" And I'm with W.)
To: Asphalt; cyborg; nuconvert
The Rothschild Effect. I love that.
42 posted on
08/04/2005 1:55:37 PM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: Asphalt
Maureen Dowd would come to such a conclusion, because she is of the leftist mindset. Her ilk feeds their friends, and starves their enemies, just like Stalin.
Normal thinking people treat everyone on an equal basis, and treat them according to their actions and not their looks.
The left discriminates in every area of life, and persecution of the non pretty people in grade school is where their leftist mania takes root.
The left is better than the rest of us, they deride and degrade all those that are foolish enough to fall to their mania, then they profess to be the saviors of those hopeless people they created through years of ceaseless torment.
45 posted on
08/04/2005 1:56:02 PM PDT by
mmercier
(communists, queers and nitwits)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson