Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

60 years later (Washington Times Editorial on Hiroshima)
Washington Times ^ | August 6, 2005 | The Editors

Posted on 08/06/2005 2:00:21 PM PDT by RWR8189

On Aug. 6, 1945, an estimated 80,000 Japanese were killed instantly in Hiroshima. Three days later, on Aug. 9, more than 100,000 Japanese in Nagasaki joined them. It was a tragic end to the bloodiest conflict in human history. The irony is that it would have been even worse had President Truman decided against using atomic weapons and instead authorized an invasion of the Japanese mainland. Estimates vary, but on the American side alone there would like have been between 200,000 and 1 million U.S. casualties. The Japanese toll would have been in the millions. And, as recent evidence reveals, the United States was not at all certain an invasion would have succeeded.

There was a time when Americans understood this context -- that the atomic bombs saved lives. It seems that 60 years has a tendency to alter perceptions that were once so clear. As a March AP-Ipsos poll found, Americans are now evenly divided over the dropping of the atomic bombs. In 1945, 85 percent of Americans approved the use of atomic weapons. Now, only 47 percent approve, while 45 percent disapprove.

These statistics are troubling, but also misleading. Among Americans 65 and older, 57 percent approve of Truman's decision and 33 percent disapprove. At the other end of the age spectrum -- 18 to 29 -- 38 percent approve and 59 percent disapprove. In fact, the older one is the more likely he or she is to approve of the bombs' use.

What explains this generational difference? Could it be that the revisionists' arguments -- so prominent on university campuses in recent years -- have successfully swayed the American public? Perhaps, but that is giving the revisionists too much credit. One possible explanation indeed concerns education, though not the sort that is politically motivated.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 60yearslater; anniversary; hiroshima; nuclearwar; truman; wt; wwii

1 posted on 08/06/2005 2:00:22 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
What explains this generational difference? Could it be that the revisionists' arguments

Why is this a surprise to anyone?

These are the same mush heads that have forgotten there was a 9-11.

2 posted on 08/06/2005 2:26:32 PM PDT by evad ( PC KILLS..and so do liberal judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Could it be that the revisionists' arguments -- so prominent on university campuses in recent years -- have successfully swayed the American public?

That's part of it. For the most part, todays generation of young people were never properly educated on the history of America and more importantly, they're spoiled rotten. I don't think they're tough enough to face hard times like during the depression or the sacrifices people made during WWII. Take away their TV, stereo, computer and video games and they're lost. LOL

3 posted on 08/06/2005 2:34:05 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It's bad form these days to believe the worst about a national enemy. It would be great if this meant we could see them clearly without demeaning propaganda; sadly, it usually means precisely the opposite.

Also, the younger you are, the less complex your worldview. There's no hierarchy of principles and some things they call "principles" are just wishful thinking.

Yeah, we dropped the most awful, destructive, terrible weapon known to man on Japan. BUT ONE WASN'T ENOUGH.


4 posted on 08/06/2005 3:38:41 PM PDT by Generic_Login_1787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Among Americans 65 and older, 57 percent approve of Truman's decision and 33 percent disapprove



How old is President Bush?

If he would have done a Hiroshima on 9/12, we'd have finished with this WOT by the end of the month.

Tagline:


5 posted on 08/06/2005 4:04:28 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This may seem off-topic, but I think it ties in. I am reading a book called "The Verdict of History" about Pearl Harbor. It goes into detail about the politics side of the disaster like "At Dawn We Slept" is about the military side.

Anyway, I am reading the comments by politicians just before the war saying that we need to oppose all of the Presidents warmongering policies. They voted against any attempt to increase funding for defense or to increase the size of the armed forces. Although party affiliation is not mentioned in the book, I have had fun looking on the Internet to see what they were. Invariably, they were Republican. I should not have been surprised. They were opposing a Demoncrat, Roosevelt.

I have often wondered why the WWII generation is so strongly Demoncratic. I thought that it was because of Roosevelt's leadership. Whatever we may think about it now, it was embraced by a large portion of the voters at the time. I am starting to think that that is at least partially wrong. It may be because the people (voters) decided to punish the people who stripped and crippled our military prior to Pearl Harbor. In this case, it was the Republicans.

So the strong support of Demoncrats by the WWII generation has two parts. Rewarding those they felt were doing good for the country and punishing those who they thought were doing bad. Hopefully, 9-11 will act as a watershed event for the Republicans, not against them. The elections since then have been in our favor, but not in the numbers I would like to see.


6 posted on 08/06/2005 4:27:01 PM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Generic_Login_1787
Yeah, we dropped the most awful, destructive, terrible weapon known to man on Japan. BUT ONE WASN'T ENOUGH.

Two almost wasn't, either. Only a little luck stopped the coup attempt (technically, the attempt to secure the radio broadcast tape from the Emperor ordering the Japanese to surrender) from succeeding and an American invasion from being necessary. Most people today just don't know their history...

7 posted on 08/06/2005 4:47:21 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Still teaching... or a reasonable facsimile thereof...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It's interesting to speculate, that if I could throw away the futures of these mush-heads kids and grandkids, they would say, "Well if it felt good for him to do it, then he should do it." What disgaceful idiots.


8 posted on 08/06/2005 4:58:18 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The battle of Iwo Jima in February 1945 made the use of the atomic bomb inevitable. That battle indicated that the Japaniese would fight to the bitter end, making the invasion of Japan a hoirrific thought.


9 posted on 08/06/2005 5:02:52 PM PDT by fqued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The last line of the article is interesting, esp. in the light of ongoing events....'In the final analysis it was America's refusal to sacrifice so many that led Truman to do what he did'. Islamofascists everywhere had better take note.


10 posted on 08/06/2005 5:07:33 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
These are the same mush heads that have forgotten there was a 9-11.

Nailed it...

11 posted on 08/06/2005 5:09:44 PM PDT by THX 1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Of course, people today are more against dropping the bomb than 1945.

Its easy to be against dropping the bomb, when it isn't you, your son, brother, or father, risking their own skins. People are always generous with OTHER peoples lives.

How many people today would - if it possible - go back in time and save the 80,000 Japanese at Hiroshima by giving up their own life or someone they love?

Probably, one in a million.
12 posted on 08/06/2005 8:16:49 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

When the Atom Bomb Fell

Oh, it went up so loud, it divided up the clouds,
And the houses did vanish away.
And a big ball of light filled the Japanese with fright.
They must have thought it was their judgment day.
Smoke and fire, it did flow through the land of Tokyo;
There was brimstone and dust everywhere.
When it all cleared away, there the cruel Japs did lay.
The answer to our fighting boys' prayers, yes, Lord,
The answer to our fighting boys' prayers.

There was no atheist in the foxholes,
And men who never prayed before
Lifted tired and bloodshot eyes to heaven
And begged the Lord to end that awful war.
They told him of their homes and loved ones.
They told him that they'd like to be there.
I believe the bomb that struck Hiroshima
Was the answer to a fighting boy's prayer.

Oh, it went up so loud, it divided up the clouds,
And the houses did vanish away.
And a big ball of light filled the Japanese with fright.
They must have thought it was their judgment day.
Smoke and fire, it did flow through the land of Tokyo;
There was brimstone and dust everywhere.
When it all cleared away, there the cruel Japs did lay.
The answer to our fighting boys' prayers, yes, Lord,
The answer to our fighting boys' prayers.

Karl & Harty,
Columbia Records #36892,
1945

13 posted on 08/06/2005 10:01:15 PM PDT by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
bump
HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman




Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches?
A "handling the hillary dud factor" AFTERWORD





the MAD hillary series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD


madhillary.com (coming soon)
madhillary.blogspot.com
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

MAD hillary talks series #1
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON
+ CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE
MAD hillary talks series #2
HILLARY'S
MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET



Do you really want THAT finger
on the button?

MAD hillary talks series #3
"What, me worry?"



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE

MAD hillary talks series #4
NANO-PRESIDENT



the danger of the unrelenting smallness
of bill + hillary clinton

MAD hillary talks series #5
SCHEMA PINOCCHIO



how the clintons are handling
the hillary dud factor



deletehillary.blogspot.com
virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

coming soon! deletehillary.com
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005




14 posted on 08/07/2005 5:45:00 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson