Or Helen Thomas!
Posted on 08/09/2005 11:37:12 AM PDT by RinAZ2005
From the Comments by David Schraub Cross-posted to The Debate Link.
Though I'm not Kos, I thought it would be fun to play him for a post. So as they say over there: Elevated from the comments of this post by David (yeah, yeah, I know. They elevate "diaries." Sue me).
I just did an informal survey, among some friends of mine (all attorneys ranging from moderate progressive to slightly conservative to libertarian/objectivist). All work here in Colorado, drink beers with me occasionally.
I asked each (separately): "Say, do you know and/or like Michelle Malkin?"
Most didn't know her. 9 out of 16 to be exact, had no clue. More liberals knew her than conservatives/libertarians.
Those that did either were vehemently opposed ("she's a racist"), or pretty impress ("good writer").
Then I asked: "What do you know about Michelle Malkin?"
This is where it got uncomfortable, at least for me as a liberal.
The progressive friends, immediately went into "uncle tom" and, I guess, race conscious "ungrateful," stuff with lots of labeling along the "hypocrisy" view. These folks had heard of her from liberal blogs, and there was more than one derogatory comment about her either based on her sex or on her ethnicity. I was actually shocked and surprised at the "friend" (I’m reevaluating this relationship) who called her the "neocon's pocket gook whore." This is a gay man, and given the crap that the GLBT community has to deal with in terms of prejudice, I was literally sitting there with my jaw on my lap. He saw my surprise and said something to the effect of: Listen, she's so 'bad' that nothing is off limits with her.
That offended me and, as I see it on display EVERWHERE in the blogosphere right now, it still offends me as a liberal.
It offends me a lot.
Interestingly, when I asked the more libertarian/conservative guys and gal who knew of Malkin what they knew about her or how they heard of her, all three said they had been forwarded something or read a link sometime back in 2002 or 2003. I asked if they knew she was Filipino, and two of the three said "Malkin?" They didn't know. I should add that none of my friends are as "net" focused for news and commentary as I am, but it did surprise me that two of the "fans" had no idea about that. The other one (the woman) said "yeah, I guess I heard that..."
SO I asked her: "Do you think her writing is really that good, or does she get 'traction' out of being able to say things with a moral authority arising out of her sex and race that other conservatives can't." She said she didn't think so, because she knew for sure that she liked Malkin and her writing BEFORE she knew her ancestry. "She writes well," was my friend's overall summary.
Suffice it to say that I'm upset by the results of my little informal poll over the last couple days. To be sure, the plural of "anecdote" is NOT evidence, but my informal inquiries have revealed that only the progressives seem to be viewing everything Malkin does through the lens of her sex and ancestry. The conservatives who even knew who she was liked her writing.
And I do think I know these folks well enough that my take on their comments is accurate (they weren't playing dumb, so to speak).
That the two progressives, including one man I would have expected better from given the bigotry he has HIMSELF had to deal with, somehow found so much loathing for Malkin that even "off limits" issues weren't off limits in terms of her.
And we as progressives need to fix that. We need to fix it really bad, because we don't "own" women or minorities, and if we keep treating them as de facto proxies who will be disowned and denigrated for straying from the "hive mind," we will surely alienate our chances of ever hoping to retain their participation in the progressive sphere.
Spot on.
UPDATE: The author adds more (and I fixed the grammar):
Well, actually, the one guy who even ventured a guess (and he's more of an Ayn Rand guy -- i.e., deluded by the "me, me, me" views of objectivism, said thought she was Jewish based on her surname.
-Anonymous.
Post script: BTW, sorry for the scattered nature of that comment, and the errors. I really was typing it in haste, and I hit post instead of preview.
My second to the last paragraph should have had an additional clause to the effect that the progressives, both those I knew, and those in the blogosphere, who were willing to "go there" in terms of using caustic slurs against someone who they viewed as "really bad," gave me some pause about how we view the world as progressives.
Speaking as a lawyer, for example, I find Clarence Thomas's legal writings (well, to be honest: the collaborative product of he and his law clerks) to be pretty much on par with what the other SCOTUS justices are putting out. That I disagree so vehemently with his legal conclusions does not -- and it should not -- cause me, as it does many progressives, to tread into the waters of: Well, here's this affirmative action beneficiary stabbing us in the back.
I clerked for a state supreme court justice with a minority background, and a surname to match. He has been championed by the progressives, except as to a couple of dissents where he made perfectly defensible legal points that weren't quite on all fours with our liberal orthodoxy and which, while far from "conservative" resulted in nasty letters to his chambers from people calling him a sell out to his race.
I support affirmative action because, as a progressive, I think the lingering effects of racism in this country undermine the notions of "equal opportunity" upon which our nation was built. There is an ongoing and lingering wrong, and it is our duty to see to it that something is done about it.
However, I do not support affirmative action as some means to make sure minority persons stay in the liberal/progressive camp. My support is not limited to minorities who promise to take the "equalizing" effects of A.A. programs and use them and any success they obtain only to such ends that we, as the liberal intelligentsia, support.
But far too many of the prominent writers and thinkers in our political sphere behave EXACTLY as if that is what they expect.
And its not right.
Comments section of site not included.
I have a sexist view of Michelle Malkin...........
Michelle makes it more difficult to caricature our beliefs as those of "angry white men", so they hate her with all their passion.
That was kind of funny.
Interesting--the musings of a liberal who's beginning to suspect that there may be something wrong with liberal "thought". There may be hope for this one.
The Dems are just envious that our side could have an articulate "woman of color" that has more pull and influence in new media than all of their Randi Rhodes' and Molly Ivins's put together.
Racism and sexism on the left? Where has this guy been??
Liberals hate people like Michelle Malkin, Laura Ingraham, and Ann Coulter because they cannot stereotype them as geeky white male conservatives. When the only conservative opinion leaders were George F. Will, William F. Buckley, and Pat Buchanan, it was easy for intellectually lazy liberals to make fun of conservatives as a bastion of upper-crusty white men. But when beautiful, smart, articulate conservative women came on the scene, the lazy liberals no longer had their stereotypes to fall back on. It has disoriented them. They are so lazy they cannot even see their screaming hypocrisy and un-liberalness when they attack these women in personal terms.
Liberals = Hypocrits
Or Helen Thomas!
That's an abuse of the pic rule!
Liberals can't stand beautiful, intelligent women like Michele Malkin, Laura Ingraham, and Ann Coulter ...
Because these women make toast out of the liberal women out there - under arm hair, burkenstocks, shrill Hillary types, bull dikes.
Liberal men don't have much to choose from, do they?
There! Feel better now?.........
Intelligent, articulate, conservative (and a drop-dead gorgeous lady for good measure). No wonder the liberals hate her so.
I have a view of sex with Michelle Malkin...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.