Skip to comments.
NYT: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker
New York Times ^
| August 11, 2005
| DOUGLAS JEHL and PHILIP SHENON
Posted on 08/11/2005 5:54:43 AM PDT by OESY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: mewzilla
They'll only lie under oath anyway. The GOP leadership will leave Weldon hanging out to dry to look like a kook. They are truly gutless.
21
posted on
08/11/2005 6:09:20 AM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid! "ALLEN IN 08")
To: mainepatsfan; All
22
posted on
08/11/2005 6:10:18 AM PDT
by
Quilla
To: Ron in Acreage
I doubt
everyone will :)
And all it takes is one.
23
posted on
08/11/2005 6:10:31 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: mainepatsfan
I don't think there are enough voters who would trust this countries national security to a woman. Not even democrats.
24
posted on
08/11/2005 6:11:58 AM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid! "ALLEN IN 08")
To: Ron in Acreage
"They'll only lie under oath anyway. The GOP leadership will leave Weldon hanging out to dry to look like a kook. They are truly gutless."
We MUST contact congress about this and DEMAND the testimony of those involved: Gorelick on down..STOP letting the elites protect each other. I hope GW BUSH will allow this to happen but I have been very disappointed so far>> marc rich pardons..nothing, Berger..slap on wrist and oK for security clearance in 3 yrs..China money to clintons..nothing, Bush Sr and Clinton acting like pals ..anyone see a pattern here??
25
posted on
08/11/2005 6:17:26 AM PDT
by
ConsentofGoverned
(A sucker is born every minute..what are the voters?)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: ConsentofGoverned
Birds of a feather.....It's disgusting. I wonder why I vote sometimes.
27
posted on
08/11/2005 6:23:14 AM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid! "ALLEN IN 08")
To: OldFriend
Tom Kean's GOP credentials should be withdrawn.
To: Ron in Acreage
I just love it when the Dem camp goes "silent". There's a big Dem conference going on somewhere. Yeh, I know...they're on vacation which gives the biased media a "shhhhh" option.
29
posted on
08/11/2005 6:24:58 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Ron in Acreage
Not exclusively.
The MAIN focus was to blame as much as possible on Bush... and of course, the CIA.
30
posted on
08/11/2005 6:26:53 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(Racially-profiling since 1963)
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
So far, there's no proof of a link between the Sandy Burgling and the Able Danger al-Qaeda organization chart. According to April press reports, Sandy burgled five drafts of the Richard Clarke millennium "after action review" from early 2000, and his handwritten notes on those reports. The Able Danger chart including Atta wasn't put together until the summer of 2000. So Sandy couldn't have burgled the chart, unless it was created earlier or the MSM's reporting is otherwise wrong.
Able Danger WAS looking into al-Qaeda links since 1999. So it's possible that information other than the chart could have made its way into the burgled after-action report.
To: OESY
We need a good cartoon of Jamie plugging the Al-Qaida information flow dike since that appear to be the reality of this US disaster.
Thanks a bunch Gorelick, Reno and Sandy (I have a pants load) Burger.
32
posted on
08/11/2005 6:30:55 AM PDT
by
rod1
To: Ron in Acreage
too right. the commission is now proof that it was a set up. How much else was left out because it did not match what one side thought or was willing to tell?
33
posted on
08/11/2005 6:50:16 AM PDT
by
q_an_a
To: OESY
NOTHING at CNN.com. That is a statement in itself.
Thankfully, I don't have TV, so I won't be aware if this story's not covered there either. Grrrr....
To: Ron in Acreage
The GOP leadership will leave Weldon hanging out to dry to look like a kook. They are truly gutless.
They are more interested in protecting their "phoney baloney jobs" than doing what is right for the People.
35
posted on
08/11/2005 6:54:32 AM PDT
by
toomanygrasshoppers
(Freud was wrong. It's all about "Roe v. Wade")
To: conservativecorner
A couple of points:
1) How can the 911 commissioners claim that they don't remember meeting with DOD officials? Didn't they keep meeting notes, or did they write the entire 911 Report from memory?
2) Why did they choose to delete any references of Able Danger from the report? Why not mention it, even if it went against their other "facts"?
3) Can I get a refund for my purchased copy of the 911 Report, or will they be issuing an addendum that says, "Oh, yeah--there were some military dudes that said they had some info on the 911 hijackers, but it doesn't matter"?
36
posted on
08/11/2005 7:04:40 AM PDT
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: OESY
Hmmmm. Summer of 2000, eh? Let's see, who was Jamie Gorelick working for then? The 9/11 commission report was a coverup for slick Willie's lawyers who cleared the path for the hijackers.
37
posted on
08/11/2005 7:22:28 AM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: bitt
In essence, Gorelick set up a system that shielded the Clinton Administration from criminal investigations.
The central question in all this can be this: If Gorelick knowlingly set up rules to obstruct investigations of criminal and national security matters, when is she going to be indicted? (We know the answer to this, but I had to ask anyway.)
38
posted on
08/11/2005 7:24:14 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
("Islam is not a religion, but rather a means of world conquest" - ALAN BURKHART.COM)
To: bitt
It was a Clinton administration cover up!
Jamie Gorlick led the lying brigade!
Hang 'em High ~ Bump!
39
posted on
08/11/2005 7:32:36 AM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: conservativecorner
Your post #26 has been deleted because it contained more material from the same New York Times article which was excerpted by the original poster of this thread.
The New York Times is an excerpt and link only site. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts
Please do not attempt to bypass copyright restrictions by completing more or all of the story in a response.
Thank you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson