Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pikamax

Lets see, there is another possible reason that it did not make it into the final report...."Conflict of interest" Gorelick was on the committee.


2 posted on 08/11/2005 12:45:57 PM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KC_for_Freedom

Gosh! Sounds familiar. What was that John Kerry answer? Can't remember the quote.


7 posted on 08/11/2005 12:49:46 PM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: KC_for_Freedom

NYT and now AP. This has officially hit the fan. Hope it lands on the right faces.


31 posted on 08/11/2005 1:07:59 PM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: KC_for_Freedom

I find it very interesting that this article makes no mention of the fact that this occurred during the Clintoon administration and that Gore-licker was on the committee. It's almost like the Times was forced to publish it because the information is becoming too wide spread and being reported by many other sources. They are very careful to not embarrass the previous administration, and leave it up to the reader to figure it out for themselves. They even make a mention of the Bush administration in an effort to coerce the reader into thinking it's a Bush issue, because the committee was established while was president. Simply f%#*ing amazing.


41 posted on 08/11/2005 1:18:08 PM PDT by hiramknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson