Posted on 08/11/2005 6:41:43 PM PDT by Sabramerican
Anti-pullout Evangelicals may try to block US aid Herb Keinon, THE JERUSALEM POST Aug. 12, 2005
A coalition of pro-Israel Evangelical groups is to meet in Washington in the near future to discuss whether to actively oppose US financial aid for Israel tied to disengagement, according to Richard Hellman, head of the Christians' Israeli Public Action Committee.
Israel and the US are currently talking about a $2.2 billion package, spread over four years, to offset disengagement costs and facilitate development of the Galilee and Negev.
Hellman, head of a small Christian-based pro-Israel lobbying group who brought a group of CIPAC members here this week, said he was not sure Evangelical groups could support such aid and may even actively oppose it.
If so, they would not be alone. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon charged that a leading member of the so-called Likud rebels opposed to disengagement went to Washington last week and lobbied an influential congressman against military aid for Israel tied to the plan.
Hellman said that there was opposition among Evangelicals to aid to the Palestinians "because they have not accounted for tens of billions of dollars they have already received," and opposition to disengagement-linked aid for Israel because it would mean the US is "inadvertently funding something that may be bad for US national security."
Hellman said his group was asking the administration and Congress to "look twice before supporting disengagement because of what it would mean for US security interests."
"If Israel, with all respect, is so foolish as to do this pull its settlers and troops out of Gaza, and thereby give Hamas, Fatah and Islamic Jihad reason for cheering and exultation that they defeated you again that is your decision. But we say that America should not endorse this, police it or possibly pay for it," Hellman said. He said that while his organization has supported foreign aid "for the defense of Israel, and surely to bring Jews home from Russia, Ethiopia and any place they are in peril, we cannot support spreading US money around just to take the sting out of the evacuation of Jews from Gaza."
On the organization's Web site, CIPAC members and friends are urged to have their US representatives ask if a $60 million increase in foreign military aid to Israel is "really for the Gaza retreat planned for mid-August."
If so, they are asked to oppose it "because the pullout is bad for US security, runs counter to the war on terror by rewarding terror and will bring more terror and attacks on US forces and personnel."
BTTT
Even if the President is too blind to see it (or just doesn't care), this surrender to terror is not in the interest of the US and the US should not pay a dime.
Your list may be interested
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
We should give aid but not tied to the expulsion. And BTW, aid is going to the "Palestinians" from many different kinds of organizations, and much of that is coordinated by our USA. ...terrible shame on us.
Money being sent to terrorists is our problem. We have no business seeking out and destroying terrorists if we're on the other hand helping them destroy an ally.
Bull's-eye!
A student told his professor he was going to "Palestine" to "fight for freedom, peace and justice,"Orwellian leftist code words that mean "murder Jews."
A Stab In The Heart [Video]
IsraelNationalNews - A Video on Gush Katif [Video]
The Nature Of Bruce ~
Especially when the terrorists are the very ones we're fighting against.
If Bush would only have followed his very own "Bush Doctrine," that he spoke so clearly following 9/11, the war of terrorism would be a war on terror. Bush said he's pursue terrorists wherever they were, but insanely makes one big exception for the Palestinian Arab terrorists in Israel. If the disengagement from Gaza does take place, God forbid, the PA area will emerge as the most major breeding ground for international terrorist training in the world.
The U.S. will bitterly regret the day President Bush said he supported a Palestinian Arab state next to Israel. The world does not need another terrorist country.
How foolhardy of the U.S. to throw good money after bad at corrupt, murderous leaders who do not and have no intention of stopping the incitement to terrorism. Only after terrorism stops should there be talk of providing money - as a reward for peaceful behavior.
The U.S. has just committed to the Palestinian Authority yet more hundreds of millions that will be used to kill U.S. citizens.
Congress is being encouraged to monitor more closely how the money to the PA is spent. The chances of doing this are as big an impossibility as was catching the "oil for food" thieves in the U.N.
Hopefully Sharon's successor will refuse it. It comes with strings, and at this point America is no friend in these negotiations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.