Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montana's governor eyes coal to solve U.S. fuel costs
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 8/26/05 | Adam Tanner - Reuters

Posted on 08/26/2005 2:59:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

HELENA, Montana (Reuters) - Montana's governor wants to solve America's rising energy costs using a technology discovered in Germany 80 years ago that converts coal into gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel.

The Fischer-Tropsch technology, discovered by German researchers in 1923 and later used by the Nazis to convert coal into wartime fuels, was not economical as long as oil cost less than $30 a barrel.

But with U.S. crude oil now hitting more than double that price, Gov. Brian Schweitzer's plan is getting more attention across the country and some analysts are taking him very seriously.

Montana is "sitting on more energy than they have in the Middle East," Schweitzer told Reuters in an interview this week.

"I am leading this country in this desire and demand to convert coal into gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel. We can do it in Montana for $1 per gallon," he said.

"We can do it cheaper than importing oil from the sheiks, dictators, rats and crooks that we're bringing it from right now."

The governor estimated the cost of producing a barrel of oil through the Fischer-Tropsch method at $32, and said that with its 120 billion tons of coal -- a little less than a third of the U.S total -- Montana could supply the entire United States with its aviation, gas and diesel fuel for 40 years without creating environmental damage.

An entry level Fischer-Tropsch plant producing 22,000 barrels a day would cost about $1.5 billion, he said.

The Democratic governor of this Republican state said he had met with Shell president John Hofmeister, General Electric's CEO Jeff Immelt, as well as officials from the Department of Defense, and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad to discuss his proposals.

Schweitzer added that the recently passed federal energy bill includes an 80 percent loan guarantee for a Fischer- Tropsch plant.

A former cattle rancher who lived for seven years in Saudi Arabia working on irrigation projects, Schweitzer is also seeking energy deals with other states, especially California.

California "says they need 25,000 megawatts of electricity during the next ten years," he said. "We'll give you a delivered price and we'll forward contract that for the next 20 years.

"Transmission companies from England, from Canada, from all over America are coming to my office and saying 'we'll build these transmission lines as soon as you have the contracts to build the generation."'


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: coal; energy; eyes; fischer; fuelcosts; governor; johnhofmeister; montana; schweitzer; tropsch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2005 2:59:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

---he's a little low oon his price but on the right page--need lots of nukes for electrical power generation too--


2 posted on 08/26/2005 3:02:31 PM PDT by rellimpank (urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I was wondering how long it would take for someone to realise we could turn coal into fuel.
The technology is old and works.

Ofcourse right when this plant starts to open the Saudi's will lower their price to try to put them out of business , we cvant fall for that one. We need to be self sufficient for oil in this country and tell the others to Kiss it. Just Kiss it.


3 posted on 08/26/2005 3:03:53 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
when this plant starts to open the Saudi's will lower their price to try to put them out of business

Not necessarily, when they can keep selling their crude to China, India and elsewhere for $60-plus a barrel.

4 posted on 08/26/2005 3:08:27 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Another article
5 posted on 08/26/2005 3:10:07 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
(fĬsh´er-trōpsh) , method for the synthesis of hydrocarbons and other aliphatic compounds. Synthesis gas, a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, is reacted in the presence of an iron or cobalt catalyst; much heat is evolved, and such products as methane, synthetic gasoline and waxes, and alcohols are made, with water or carbon dioxide produced as a byproduct. An important source of the hydrogen-carbon monoxide gas mixture is the gasification of coal (see water gas ). The process is named after F. Fischer and H. Tropsch, the German coal researchers who discovered it in 1923.
6 posted on 08/26/2005 3:10:35 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || (To Libs:) You are failing to celebrate MY diversity! || Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Not a new idea - even here.
Kiln-in-Gas bankrupted the great Allis Chalmers company in the early 1980's.


7 posted on 08/26/2005 3:10:56 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is something entirely different I take from oil shale - which I believe is far more expensive to process.


8 posted on 08/26/2005 3:11:29 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

--yes--totally different--


9 posted on 08/26/2005 3:15:45 PM PDT by rellimpank (urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mulch
I was wondering how long it would take for someone to realise we could turn coal into fuel.

The technology is here and has been for decades.
Folks in South Africa do it every day.
The main thing is to make it economically feasable.

USA is the like 50 Arabias as far is coal is concerned.

For further reading I would refer you to:
http://www.sasol.com
10 posted on 08/26/2005 3:19:09 PM PDT by 76834 (There's nothing wrong with sobriety in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
HA..Ha...ha......................

Schweitzer said Montana has a huge advantage over other states because it owns the Otter Creek reserves, which the federal government traded to it after President Clinton halted a proposed gold mine near Yellowstone National Park

Eat your shorts lefties

11 posted on 08/26/2005 3:22:29 PM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Shardenfreuden = Stratenshardenfreudenery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 76834

And the thing most often missed: We aren't 1940 era Germans. Who knows if the wheels of capitalism were to roll with this concept how much cheaper and economical the method for conversion can be made.


12 posted on 08/26/2005 3:22:44 PM PDT by samm1148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"environmentalists" will oppose this, too.


13 posted on 08/26/2005 3:24:08 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (DON'T BICKER, DRINK LIQUOR-DON'T THINK, JUST DRINK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samm1148
Coal eh....don't gas turbines and diesels work on pulverized coal.......?

Put the H2-er's out of work

14 posted on 08/26/2005 3:24:22 PM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Shardenfreuden = Stratenshardenfreudenery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mulch
More:
Sasol produces 1,5 billion barrels of synthetic fuel from coal in fifty years more >>>
24 August 2005

Sasol has produced almost 1,5 billion barrels of synthetic fuel from about 800 million tonnes of coal since the first sample of synthetic oil from coal was produced fifty years ago at its Sasolburg plant near Johannesburg in South Africa on 23 August 1955.

Regarded as a world technology leader in the production of coal-to-liquids (CTL), Sasol operates the world's only commercial scale synthetic plant at Secunda, where it produces 150 000 barrels of liquid fuel per day.

15 posted on 08/26/2005 3:26:53 PM PDT by 76834 (There's nothing wrong with sobriety in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samm1148
And the thing most often missed: We aren't 1940 era Germans. Who knows if the wheels of capitalism were to roll with this concept how much cheaper and economical the method for conversion can be made.

Point taken and understood.
With fuel prices like they are now we are fast beginning to resemble the fuel starved Germans of 1940.
Main difference here is we are sitting on top of 10 mountains of coal and are freezing to death.
All we really need to do is to stop complaining, get off our asses and dig.
16 posted on 08/26/2005 3:33:12 PM PDT by 76834 (There's nothing wrong with sobriety in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 76834

Lots of coal is a mile deep and hard to mine. Drill down to the formation, introduce hot hydrogen and the right catalyst, and get oil and hydrocarbon gases up. Fischer-Tropsch in situ.


17 posted on 08/26/2005 3:46:44 PM PDT by dr huer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dr huer

You got it.
Extract all the "Coal Bed Methane" you can then do similiar but hotter.
Was thinking something along the line of Frasch Process, where they pump superheated water down the hole and product comes out.
Maybe use the CBM to fuel the thing.
Your thoughts?


18 posted on 08/26/2005 3:52:13 PM PDT by 76834 (There's nothing wrong with sobriety in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Alaska has half the country's coal reserves. Much of it is wet coal, and low sulfur. The wet coal can be converted by hydrothermal processing or hot-water drying, which yields a liquid coal-water fuel that can be burned almost like oil. Some roads would have to be built to get at the coal.


19 posted on 08/26/2005 3:52:23 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and open the Land Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Some roads would have to be built to get at the coal.

The friendly folks at Union Pacific and BNSF might be interested in building the road.
/grin>
20 posted on 08/26/2005 3:57:21 PM PDT by 76834 (There's nothing wrong with sobriety in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson