I know Jim Gilchrist, and have had several conversations with him about this subject.
While he initially opposed going into Iraq, since we did he has stood unfailingly with the troops and fully supports staying the course until the mission is completed.
The man was wounded trying to save a buddy's life in 'Nam, and has been the one person most responsible for actually ACTING to bring attention to the situation on the border.
I don't think he has any explaining or apologizing to do to anyone, as the poster of this thread would seem to insinuate.
And, this poster still hasn't explained why he isn't on the ballot, but claims to be running.
Something more than a little bit fishy here, I would say.
Now state flat out that Gilchrist opposes the war and displays a liberal view on the issue. He's a liberal and that's why you are trying to psych me.
I firmly support the Iraq War before, during, and after!