Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can You Believe in God and Evolution?
TIME ^ | Sunday, Aug. 07, 2005 | DAVID VAN BIEMA

Posted on 08/28/2005 6:57:43 AM PDT by Skylab

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
To: The Coopster
I don't make any such assumption. It is those who say that the Earth must be less than 20,000 years old who make the assumption that they know EXACTLY how and when God created the heavens and the earth.

In which case they would say that one cannot believe in Evolution AND God, in Geology AND God, or in Astronomy AND God. Because all three use scientific methods of measurement that push WAAAAaaaaaaaaay past 20,000 years.
161 posted on 08/28/2005 8:25:57 PM PDT by Mylo ( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SolarisRocks
How does one test for God?

I use standard God test strips, with confirmation from mass spectrometry if necessary. The strips have a high rate of false positives.

162 posted on 08/28/2005 10:54:48 PM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: AlGone2001

Since we know the grass needs the sun in order to live, there could not have been a long period of time between days."



1. [23] And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.


163 posted on 08/28/2005 11:19:04 PM PDT by philetus (What goes around comes around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mylo
It is those who say that the Earth must be less than 20,000 years old who make the assumption that they know EXACTLY how and when God created the heavens and the earth. In which case they would say that one cannot believe in Evolution AND God, in Geology AND God, or in Astronomy AND God.

It's even worse than that. Young Earth creationists can't believe in Nuclear Physics. Many, many different items within nuclear physics, such as sun fusion information, nuclear half life issues, on and on. I'd hate to disagree with these folks, who theorized they could build really big bombs by using their knowledge, and proved it by making them work.

YECers can't believe in simple mathematics. Because they don't believe the number of layers of sediment that you can count in deep mine shafts and well cores.

They don't believe in plate tectonics. Where we can measure how fast the plates are moving, and compute how long it took the plate to move from point A to point B. Or how long it took to raise the Himalayas, that we know are growing by a certain amount, and we know how high they are, enabling us to measure how long they've been growing.

Young Earth Creationists just have to throw out all of science. All of it. There's virtually no field of science that doesn't have some bearing, or method of measuring, how old the earth is.

All those fields of science agree almost perfectly with one another, which shows either a vast conspiracy, or they've got the right answer. While YECers and Christians have hundreds of different variations on their beliefs, meaning you can discount all of them.

164 posted on 08/29/2005 12:42:43 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Skylab
Can You Believe in God and Evolution?

In a word, "Yes".

165 posted on 08/29/2005 12:44:56 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onja

Not necessarily. Death and suffering are not themselves evil (not-good), only people can be evil in the traditional sense.


166 posted on 08/29/2005 4:41:36 PM PDT by Gava
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Biker Pat

"Furthermore, if in fact there was death in the world before Adam,..."

No, not that kind of death. Before they ate from the tree of knowledge they had no knowledge of death (death as a sinister happening). As for physical death, it's just another form of change. If change didn't happen during and before the creation of Adam and Eve, Adam and Eve themselves would never come into existence!

In order for point A to progress toward point B, point A must first begin.


167 posted on 08/29/2005 5:22:03 PM PDT by Gava
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AlGone2001
"God's more impressed with whether I bear the fruit of the Spirit than anything else. It is our fruit that He will judge, not our intelligence or our talents."

In our communion with God, only what we are matters. Spirituality, intelligence, and talents are all part of us. Furthermore, I find it hard to believe that anyone can impress God!!!!
168 posted on 08/29/2005 6:14:37 PM PDT by Gava
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Mylo

My bad. I misunderstood your post.

Have a good one.......


169 posted on 08/29/2005 6:49:09 PM PDT by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose
[Strict evolutionists usually are Liberals from what I've found. Please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't even Darwin change his views towards the end of his days? There are no Athiests or Liberals in foxholes.]



The adherents to evolutionary theory here at FR (including myself) are anything but liberal. It's a scientific theory, not a political theory, although it has been misused by liberals (and others) to advance their ideology.

Darwin did not change his "views". The idea that he did so is nothing more than wishful thinking perpetuated by his detractors.

There are plenty of atheists and liberals in foxholes, and there is no reason to believe that people who live their whole lives with a firm set of ideological principles, regardless of left or right or religious or scientific, are going to renounce them all at once and start praying to God when they believe death is near.
170 posted on 08/29/2005 8:22:40 PM PDT by spinestein (The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tkas

Great post.


171 posted on 08/29/2005 8:31:09 PM PDT by spinestein (The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

[It is really hard for me to get from crystals or little oily spheres to DNA in the short span of years allowed by the Geological and Paleontological records of the planet.]



One billion years is a SHORT span of years?


172 posted on 08/29/2005 8:39:27 PM PDT by spinestein (The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Sender

[The sticking point I have with most scientific evolutionists is their scoffing at the possibility of a divine creator. Why must science insist on the absence of God? Why is any belief in creation labeled as ignorant mythology? Why are religious people stereotyped as weak minds by the scientists?]


I think it's fair to say (especially after reading the sampling of replys on this thread) that most evolutionists are accepting of religious faith and don't look down on its practitioners, and many, if not most evolutionists are people of faith themselves.

It would be more accurate to say that those who reject evolutionary theory do so because they believe in the literal word of the Bible and in the idea that anyone who doesn't share this specific faith is a "fool".


173 posted on 08/29/2005 8:49:40 PM PDT by spinestein (The facts fairly and honestly presented, truth will take care of itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
One billion years is a SHORT span of years?

For a goodly part of that first billion years the Earth was a REALLY nasty place.

174 posted on 08/29/2005 10:31:53 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

Comment #175 Removed by Moderator

To: THEUPMAN
Then where would all the people have lived?
176 posted on 08/31/2005 8:32:17 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Skylab

It's interesting to me (but not altogether surprising) that the only person quoted here that answers unequivocally no to the question of whether God and evolution are compatible is the YEC. I think Pinker's response, which might very well be taken by some for a no, is more of a nonresponsive answer. He doesn't tackle the question of the compatibility of God and evolution, but rather just states his own position of atheism. He basically is just saying that belief in X and belief in God are incompatible, no matter what X may be.


177 posted on 08/31/2005 10:37:16 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

whos standard do you use to define "evil"


178 posted on 09/01/2005 8:48:52 AM PDT by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson