thats a stupid question that is an attack on his personal life....comments like that belong on a democratic site, as only they sink that low
It might have a bearing on the a disagreement or animosity that might have existed between the two justices.
That disagreement might explain the reason the Souter had nothing good to say about Rehnquist, as he may have felt rejected by Rehnquist. That estrangement might also partially explain why Souter moved to the liberal block of the Court.
It wasn't an attack. It was a request for information that might have a bearing on the news in this thread and also on the liberal alignment of Souter after his appointment to the Court.
A question is a personal attack?
Perhaps you're better suited for another forum.
It's only an attack on his personal life if you hate gays.
Been here 8 days and you're telling others to leave, huh? Pretty brazen for a newbie, dontcha think?
I completely agree with you, now and then someone from our team comes out so extreme (and stupid), it nauseates me.....