[vannrox]

Nice post.

It has long been known that our star; the sun, is a fourth generation star. In other words, it was created from the dust and debris of an earlier star. Which, the earlier star, was formed from the dust and debris from a yet even earlier star. Thisstar as also formed from the debris of an earlier star which was formed from a star that was created from the debris left over from the big bang.

By all accounts, each star had planets, as we know know that systems with planetary bodies are quite common.

Why would it be too difficult to understand that one of these earlier planets had life on it? Is it really too difficult to understand the life form that might be billions of years old?

[null and void]

Is it really too difficult to understand the life form that might be billions of years old?

Yeah. Nothing is older than 4004 BC...

[Right in Wisconsin]

God is Life, He's Everything, including a billion years old, and yes He is Alive! So its not to hard to believe "the life form that may be a billion years old." That said, if what you are saying is so obvious, then why wasn't it mentioned by one of the Scientists studying the issue?