Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
"Funding for a study that would describe the steps necessary to protect the Lake Pontchartrain Basin from a Cat 5 hurricane was discussed, and cut by Congress in 1998."

There is so much shared blame for this tragedy that it is embarassing...from the local level to the federal, and everyone in between. Although I don't believe I stated so, congress is responsible, not only for not providing the necessary funding for preventing the inevitable (and thus playing Russian Roulette with the lives of the residents of New Orleans), but in confirming (I believe without opposition) Mike Brown to head FEMA when he was clearly unqualified for the position, both in lacking practical experience and qualities of effective and forceful leadership.

236 posted on 09/10/2005 11:13:13 AM PDT by infocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: infocats
"In December of 1995, the Orleans Levee Board, the local government entity that oversees the levees and floodgates designed to protect New Orleans and the surrounding areas from rising waters, bragged in a supplement to the Times-Picayune newspaper about federal money received to protect the region from hurricanes.

"In the past four years, the Orleans Levee Board has built up its arsenal. The additional defenses are so critical that Levee Commissioners marched into Congress and brought back almost $60 million to help pay for protection," the pamphlet declared. "The most ambitious flood-fighting plan in generations was drafted. An unprecedented $140 million building campaign launched 41 projects."

The levee board promised Times-Picayune readers that the "few manageable gaps" in the walls protecting the city from Mother Nature's waters "will be sealed within four years (1999) completing our circle of protection."

But less than a year later, that same levee board was denied the authority to refinance its debts. Legislative Auditor Dan Kyle "repeatedly faulted the Levee Board for the way it awards contracts, spends money and ignores public bid laws," according to the Times-Picayune. The newspaper quoted Kyle as saying that the board was near bankruptcy and should not be allowed to refinance any bonds, or issue new ones, until it submitted an acceptable plan to achieve solvency.

Blocked from financing the local portion of the flood fighting efforts, the levee board was unable to spend the federal matching funds that had been designated for the project."

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=%5CNation%5Carchive%5C200509%5CNAT20050907a.html
246 posted on 09/10/2005 11:27:37 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

To: infocats

By 1998, Louisiana's state government had a $2 billion construction budget, but less than one tenth of one percent of that -- $1.98 million -- was dedicated to levee improvements in the New Orleans area. State appropriators were able to find $22 million that year to renovate a new home for the Louisiana Supreme Court and $35 million for one phase of an expansion to the New Orleans convention center.

The following year, the state legislature did appropriate $49.5 million for levee improvements, but the proposed spending had to be allocated by the State Bond Commission before the projects could receive financing. The commission placed the levee improvements in the "Priority 5" category, among the projects least likely to receive full or immediate funding.


248 posted on 09/10/2005 11:32:34 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson