That's a valid question. I'd rather play neither, but we are replacing a woman. I think it's reasonable for people to desire to replace her with another. Should it be a slam dunk female appointment? I don't think it needs to be. Realizing that a request is reasonable, is not the same as thinking the request should be honored no matter what.
"I'd rather play neither"
Me too, but probably won't happen in my children's lifetime.
It seems you are playing the anti diversity or anti change game. That is since there are no hispanics or asians on scotus, none should be allowed since you prefer that people be replaced one for one based on race and gender.
Your position is absurd by the way.