Posted on 09/17/2005 5:02:45 PM PDT by My2Cents
Harris Needs Image Change to Win Seat
By BRENDAN FARRINGTON, Associated Press Writer
Sat Sep 17, 2005
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - If Katherine Harris has any hope of beating U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson (news, bio, voting record), she may need an extreme makeover.
The Republican congresswoman's poll numbers are poor; her appearance is a distracting issue; and many non-Republican voters see her as a flirty, vacant, beauty-queen wannabe who used her role in the 2000 presidential recount to get to Capitol Hill.
Most political observers think that she can make the race competitive, though, as long as she can shed that image.
"She's going to surprise people who think she's not going to do well," said Carol Weissert, a Florida State University political science professor. "I just hope it goes beyond whether she has too much makeup and what she wears. ... If she does talk about issues and she's able to put this aside, it may be a very different campaign a year from now."
The race is seen as critical to Democrats who want to regain control of the Senate. Republicans have a 55-44 majority, with one Democratic-leaning independent. There will be 33 Senate seats on ballots next year.
Other races are expected to be tighter, including Democratic efforts to oust Republican Sen. Rick Santorum (news, bio, voting record) in Pennsylvania, and Tennessee's election to fill Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's seat, but the Florida race will be closely watched largely because of Harris' infamy.
Fair or not, voters formed an image of Harris based on five weeks in 2000 when she oversaw the disputed presidential election as Florida's secretary of state. People know little about her four years in the state Senate and three years in Congress, but she's still accused of stealing the election for George W. Bush and her makeup is still the subject of late night talk show jokes.
So far, Harris hasn't done much to shift focus away from herself.
As she prepared to start her campaign, she claimed on a radio show that newspapers doctored photos of her during the recount — a claim denied by news agencies. That rekindled makeup jokes, and Harris was skewered by newspaper columnists.
Largely because of those comments — and the fact that she made light of the issue in her kickoff speech — several major Florida newspapers devoted space to the makeup issue the day she began her campaign.
That night she was on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes" in an appearance many Republicans are privately calling an embarrassment and one that liberal bloggers have had a field day with.
She stood at an unusual angle for a television interview — her body position and smile reminiscent of a beauty pageant contestant — even as hosts Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes talked about how people have been cruel to her.
"Some people characterize it as flirtation and that's something that she probably would prefer not to have as her image," Lynda Lee Kaid, a University of Florida professor who specializes in telecommunication in politics, said of the interview.
While most candidates get a boost in polls when they have widely publicized campaign announcements, Harris lost ground in a Quinnipiac University poll. She trailed Nelson by a margin of 57-33 percentage points in a survey taken after her announcement.
Some of the blame has to go to Harris, observers say. She should be talking only about issues, not eye shadow. And instead of being flirty with conservative talk show hosts, she should put the focus on Nelson's record and her accomplishments.
"Voters will be willing to listen to what she has to say but if (her image) continues to be the one that it was in these incidents, she won't be able to beat Bill Nelson or anybody else," Kaid said.
Harris has three things that could work in her favor: time, money and good political advice.
She's expected to cash in IOUs after years of helping other Republicans around the country. And her political adviser, Adam Goodman, is the same person who helped her win two other elections when few people gave her a chance: a 1994 state Senate seat and the secretary of state position four year later.
"The campaign is all about taking the Katherine Harris story to over 90 percent of the Florida public who at best only knows a chapter or two," Goodman said, adding later: "she is the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party against a vulnerable Democratic incumbent in a state that is voting more decidedly Republican. You've got to love those odds."
Nelson spokesman Dan McLaughlin acknowledged that the race will be tight, predicting that Harris and Republicans will raise $25 million to $30 million to slam the incumbent. He welcomed a race that focuses on issues and accomplishments, and not image.
"Unless things get way out of hand with all the negative junk and he gets accused of being a terrorist or something, Bill will run a campaign that says here's what I've done and here's what my opponent has done," McLaughlin said. "I couldn't tell you one thing Katherine Harris has done in office or stands for or would do in the Senate."
OOPS....spelled your name wrong.....meant to ping you to my # 39.
You wouldn't think so with their thin skin.
She, Rick Santorum, and Jeanine Pirro will all be getting contributions next year.
Unfortunately, she is the best GOPer in the race. We need someone else.
It's from 2003, when she appeared at the Arcadia rodeo.
Geez, that is totally, absolutely, you know, disgusting!
Hi Julie, thanks for the
((((ping))))
Problem is, the only other candidate with I.D. who's considering the race is Congressman Mark Foley, who is unfeasible for reasons well-known to conservatives who are up on the DC rumor mill.
2006 is shaping up to be a wash, or worse, for the GOP.
yup. Jeb needs to run.
There seems to be an arrangement problem here. Hummmmmm?
Unfortunately this is absolutly true. I saw that show. She was sitting with her side to the camera, looking over her shoulder, boobs thrust out, all as if she was posing for a playboy pin-up. Also, she dodged the questions and came off as a complete airhead. I couldn't believe this was the same woman that impressed me so much in the aftermath of the 2000 election.
Image? Looks?? "Extreme makeover"??
Who's more shallow than Democratic shills from the MSM?
>>
Troll???
<<
Nope. Just showing the beauty demoRATs have to offer.
They did this to Reagan. When the voters found out Reagan wasn't evil or stupid they re-elected him in a landslide.
Their attack on Harris will do no better. When the voters watch her on the campaign trail they will deduce...like so many before them...that the MSM is full of liars.
It is a terrible strategy to take down a Republican candidate because it lowers expectation immediately and even if the candidate proves to be just competent the voters were not expecting much anyways.
The media never learns from their mistakes. They still think they have a monopoly on the truth.
Nope. Just showing the beauty demoRATs have to offer.
The highly "respected" helen thomas!??!
No problem here with her image.
You evil man. ;o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.