Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
That's not true. They took in more than they spent those years. It was a surplus. And even if you don't like the accounting methods, it's under the SAME accounting methods now that we are doing far worse.

So where'd the extra money go if it wasn't spent? The federal debt didn't go down at all from 1993 through 2000. So if the money wasn't spent and the debt didn't go down, where's the money?

Annual Historical Debt Outstanding
Date Amount
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66

There never was a surplus, just smoke and mirrors.

75 posted on 09/21/2005 8:26:52 AM PDT by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: whd23

If I'm not mistaken, the interest on the debt causes the number to keep going up, even when we pay down the principal, as we did in the late 90s. I don't have any data available at the moment, though.


78 posted on 09/21/2005 8:28:42 AM PDT by Huck (There's nothing you can hold for very long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson