Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Focus for Supreme Court Pick Is Said to Be on Diversity
The New York Times ^ | September 22, 2005 | By ELISABETH BUMILLER

Posted on 09/21/2005 9:44:32 PM PDT by alessandrofiaschi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Jim Noble

Janice Rogers Brown, Janice Rogers Brown, Janice Rogers Brown, Janice Rogers Brown, Janice Rogers Brown, Janice Rogers Brown.

Hell no, the votes are not determined by the hearings. Few senators have the guts to do the right thing. They are moved only by their perception of getting re-elected. Nothing else matters to most of these boobs. A very few of them stand on principle, like Coburn from OK, Rep. Tancredo from CO and a handful more, but most are in love with the perks and power.


41 posted on 09/22/2005 5:35:19 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Statement: "Focus for Supreme Court Pick Is Said to Be on Diversity"

Response: Well if Bush has any decency he will select a truly "Diverse" person; i.e. a person who is Black, Asian, and Caucasian, who lived in Terra Del Fuego and started as a Catholic, dabbled in wicca, converted to the Protestant faith and is currently being taught the mysteries of the Jewish faith by a Rabbi.

42 posted on 09/22/2005 5:42:33 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
President Bush is focused on Hispanics, African-Americans and women to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, and he may announce his choice for her seat on the Supreme Court as early as the court's opening days in October, Republican strategists said on Wednesday.

Yeah? - well I say bull-hockey.
I bet these are the same strategists who were touting Edith Clement as a 'sure thing' when Dubya picked Roberts.

43 posted on 09/22/2005 6:34:54 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
***Well if Bush has any decency he will select a truly "Diverse" person; i.e. a person who is Black, Asian, and Caucasian, who lived in Terra Del Fuego and started as a Catholic, dabbled in wicca, converted to the Protestant faith and is currently being taught the mysteries of the Jewish faith by a Rabbi.***

Huh? You really think he'll pick Madonna?

:-)

44 posted on 09/22/2005 6:36:54 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Williams
"Specter's suggestion is pure insanity and cowardice. No other explanation."

Specter = Typical Liberal Jew baby killer

The only difference between Specter and Jumpin' Jeffords is the spelling of their names.
45 posted on 09/22/2005 6:40:46 AM PDT by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

"WASHINGTON, Sept. 21 - President Bush is focused on Hispanics, African-Americans and women to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, and he may announce his choice for her seat on the Supreme Court as early as the court's opening days in October, Republican strategists said on Wednesday."

Great! Miquel Estrada. The RATS had nothing on him back then and nothing on him now. The only thing they can do it hit him on experience. But that didn't stop Ginsburg either.



46 posted on 09/22/2005 7:00:56 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
JRB="Briar Patch"

The dems whined about Roberts being a white man, and they will get what they wished for.

47 posted on 09/22/2005 7:06:17 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
I still have this linked speech by JRB bookmarked. It is remarkable in its power and clarity. My favorite line: Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.

Janice Rogers Brown is my clear choice.

48 posted on 09/22/2005 8:02:50 AM PDT by buzzyboop (no tags, no fuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady
make the Left go berserk.

It doesn't really matter who the president nominates, the left will go beserk regardless. So he might as well nominate one to show them up for what they are.

49 posted on 09/22/2005 8:15:10 AM PDT by hoosiermama ( Blanco, Landrieu, Nagin & Witt.. good name for a flood control business...Motto:"We got dikes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
if she is chosen she will need some coaching for a better showing. Do you really think that the votes are determined by the hearings?

Televised hearings, I most certainly do.
The left if run by special interest groups.
They wanted Judge Roberts DEFEATED soundly and the strategists on the left look like idiots before the nation (not just to us) for voting down this man who came across as Judicial Rock Star in the hearings.
Sadly, I do not think the substantive matters in the hearings decides the votes.

50 posted on 09/22/2005 9:06:52 AM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite

I would love to see Edith Jones nominated. My guess is that he might go for Edith "Joy" Clement. I believe she's from from Louisiana and has some bi-partisan support down there.


51 posted on 09/22/2005 9:29:06 AM PDT by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
The folks talkin' don't know. And the folks who do know ain't talkin'.
52 posted on 09/22/2005 9:30:02 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buzzyboop

WOW! Great speech. We need JRB. She may be the only one who truly understands the depth of our nation's problem!


53 posted on 09/22/2005 1:21:44 PM PDT by arnoldknox (BUSH WINS, AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Robert Bork

...That would give the Dems a collective coronary and require quadruple bypass surgery.
54 posted on 09/22/2005 1:22:08 PM PDT by T Lady (The Mainstream Media: Public Enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Nipplemancer
Gay Conservatives?

Im afraid not.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

55 posted on 09/22/2005 1:55:42 PM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Yes, we need a minority nominee to give the Donks an opportunity to show off their racist tendencies.


56 posted on 09/22/2005 2:00:03 PM PDT by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi; All

The New York Times says the focus is on a minority and/or woman?

I have never been so certain of anything in my life now. It's definitely going to be Luttig.


57 posted on 09/22/2005 3:19:53 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("It would be a hard government that should tax its people 1/10th part of their income."-Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

The focus SHOULD be on who supports the constitution, but I
guess that doesn't count anymore.


58 posted on 09/22/2005 3:25:07 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
Soul Seeker said: "Here's something I will throw out as very likely. The President has probably had his preferred selection decided long in advance, as he had Roberts in his sights long ago. "

I agree with you.

If the process that Bush carried out to select Robert's did not include serious consideration of whomever becomes his next selection, then that process was inadequate. We're only talking about a couple of weeks of time. Too little for the assessment of various candidates to have changed.

59 posted on 09/22/2005 5:34:26 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

LOL!


60 posted on 09/22/2005 7:43:20 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson