You can bet that the enviro-wackos will fight this in court every step of the way.
Posted on 09/23/2005 9:45:54 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
As helping refugees from New Orleans continues, a few people are turning some attention to the long-term future of that City. Begin with this: there must be a new New Orleans.
As I write this, New Orleans is flooding again, from the long distance effects of Hurricane Rita. There is a law of hydraulics that great masses of water can be controlled or channeled, but not absolutely stopped. This law is as inexorable as gravity.
Thomas Jefferson understood the vital importance of the Mississippi River and the Port of New Orleans to the whole nation. Aaron Burr recognized the same when he planned a revolt against the United States, by seizing an island in the River for a stranglehold on that commerce.
Add to that ancient commercial interest the contribution in oil, gas, and refineries. It’s clear the City must be reestablished. The key questions are, how large, where, how constructed, and who pays for it? Smaller but still important questions: can its unique style, citizenry, food, music, and architecture survive?
Discussing taller levees and canal walls is foolish. Build them to withstand a Category 4 or even 5 storm only postpones the inevitable. Look at the rapid loss of the protective marshes south of the City. Eventually any barriers will fail. Then the loss of life and property really will resemble a nuclear attack.
New Orleans must be rebuilt, but not as a bowl. That seems like an oxymoron. It’s not. Hart-Miller Islands in the Chesapeake Bay provide the answer.
The Chesapeake is one of the largest estuaries in the world. Despite excellent management of its watershed, it still washes thousands of tons of silt into the ocean annually. That’s much less than the silt in the Mississippi, but still huge. The Army Corps of Engineers has spent decades dredging the Bay to maintain the ship channels to the Ports of Baltimore and Philadelphia.
Decades ago, the Corps realized that dredging mud from one place in the Bay to another, even miles away, only hastened the refilling of the ship channels. So they started pumping the mud into permeable dikes around existing islands and selected shallow areas. The result is, over the course of a decade, that mud dries itself and produces new land
Apply that thinking to New Orleans. Dike the lowest-lying areas in the City. Pump silt continuously from the bottom of the Mississippi behind those dikes. In time, the City will become an island, safely above any storm surge that may come. It takes years for that silt to become solid ground. The City can’t wait 15 years or so, to begin rebuilding.
It doesn’t have to.
Consider the constant new construction in Washington, D.C. . Every high rise begins with I-beams being driven deep into the ground so the building stands on those, not on its concrete foundation. That’s because Washington used to be a swamp. The surface cannot support a high-rise building. (Insert your own jokes about Washington “still being a swamp,” here.)
Using the Washington technique to rebuild in New Orleans means that reconstruction can begin now, while the current ground level is still about 15 feet below the eventual ground level. And who would be the first with a financial incentive to rebuild? It’s the tourist and gambling industries.
Owners seeking profits in the new New Orleans could be required to help the City in two ways. One is including housing for workers and their families in any new construction. “Factory towns” are a centuries-old tradition in America. That can and should be revived in this unique circumstance. The other assistance would be contributing to a monorail on a concrete, overhead structure, connecting the rebuilt parts of the City with the historic parts on high enough ground to remain as is. (Think Seattle, Las Vegas, Disney World.)
Properly handled, New Orleans might be commercially functional, with at least half its vibrant, attractive style and life and population which attracts travelers who support its economy, within three years. And, it will be safe for the indefinite future, regardless of the storms that might come. However, a lot of people, including some clueless politicians, will have to work day and night to cut red tape, to make that happen.
New Orleans is well-known for klepto-crats, prevari-crats and bureaucrats. Louisiana is not much better. Putting $200 billion in those hands is foolish. Besides, the whole Gulf Coast is in danger, not just where Katrina hit. Therefore, why not create the Gulf Coast Authority? GCA would be patterned on the TVA, and raise money from taxes on tourism, as well as spend money designated for relief. Think building codes, flood management, advance planning.
It can all be done. Just not by the same cast of characters.
About the Author: John Armor is a First Amendment attorney and author who lives in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. John_Armor@aya.yale.edu
I did not expect the proof that New Orleans cannot be rebuilt as is to come so soon, within weeks. But there it is, and here is the related article.
John / Billybob
it's a crescent shaped city without the lowlying areas, right?
paint it red. the libs will love you fer it;-)
The idea that we can control, modify, let alone even anticipate nature is preposterous. To add to your comments about the Chesapeake....look back to 1993 and Isobel...It wne across the Carolina barrier islands as a Cat 3...then went up the coast as a weak Cat 1...yet it still pushed a storm surge all the way up Chesapeake Bay that put 6-9 feet of water all over Annapolis..at the other end of the Bay..
Hey, that's neat you mentioned Hart & Miller Island! My family boats out there many times each summer!
People congregate there to show off and drink beer.
Its known as the Polish Bahamas.
You can bet that the enviro-wackos will fight this in court every step of the way.
Oh, wow! I've never heard that nickname. My family will get a kick out of that! (My dad's Polish.)
Really, given the location, shouldn't it be called the "Hon" Bahamas? (As in, "Didja still wanna get the crabcakes, hon?")
Fie on all envirowackos and the judges who ought to know better.
Blessed are they who study the science and make rational decisions.
Good thinking!
When the Atchafalaya River captures all the water of the Mississippi, presumably after the next major lower Mississippi flood, all of these concernes will be pretty much moot.
This is a great idea, and I agree that there is no point in spending billions to rebuild anew below sea level.
Your premise is flawed in one area - the creation of a CGA. The TVA has never gone away and continues to be a boondoggle years after it lost its rationale for being. So would the CGA, creating its own bureaucracy to create more onerous regulations over time.
I say it's time for government to get out of the way and let the entrepreneurs have at it. No new commissions, authorities, federal or state oversight, or the like. Since most facilities/properties in the area are private, let the government concentrate on its properties and on cutting reg and red tape and leave individuals alone.
New Orleans is well-known for klepto-crats, prevari-crats and bureaucrats.
However, I do agree with the poster that objects to the concept of the Gulf Coast Authority. If this project is worthy of being done and makes economic sense, let the private sector handle it.
Are you proposing putting the Gulf Coast Authority under the supervision of Senators Zell Miller and Gary Hart?
Blanko on just now saying just the opposite -- must rebuild with higher levees and storm walls. Asking for anyone in the area that will be flooded to get out. Saying work is going on to repair the leeves. Now talking about SW LA evacuation.
At some point, the US taxpayers will rebel against the power structure in NO and LA being "stuck on stupid".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.