I can't describe the shock I felt, and my classmates, the horror that this constituted accepted 'research' when I first learned about his 'methods'. It was sickening. At the time, (although my mother had mentioned it earlier) I was a college student studying psychology about 20 years ago. We discussed his methods and why they were wrong and why Kinsey and his work was being disavowed by many, especially in the mainstream. That's right, my professors thought he and his 'work' was vile and a discredit to actual psychology. And we discussed the idea that some were trying to 'revive' his work and we were told we would see changes made in the years to come. How right Drs. W & W were.
It seems to me that the Clinton era and the gay friendly education changes have turned real 'science' on it's ear and attemtpted to revive such heinousness.
And in reviving it as 'real' science and honoring the man, the powers that be seem especially intent on emphasizing this part:
He also claimed that any harm caused to the child through sex with an adult was not to be blamed upon the 'partner' but upon the hysteria created by parents, police, and others.
Revolting.
Last year (or was it early this year?) Liam Neeson (another actor I'll never watch) portrayed Kinsey as a misunderstood hero type, from what I read on FR. A movie with Kinsey as the hero. That's enough to make you hurl your very innards.
Not only has Kinsey's "research from hell" been resurrected in order to mainstream and/or normalize perversion, but so too has his terminology. "Partner," for example, was used by Kinsey to avoid reality (saying rapist) by disguising pure evil in an innocupus sounding term . Homosexual agendists have likewise confiscated that term in order to avoid reality.