Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
What, if anything, is Russert hiding and why aren't his bosses at NBC now demanding that Russert, who's clearly part of an important news event, step forward as a journalist and report the facts as he knows them?

Maybe they're waiting for Libby to telepathically deduce that he needs another redundant waiver and personal MillerTime call, too, first.

10 posted on 10/14/2005 12:29:05 AM PDT by STARWISE (Able Danger: DISABLED??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: All
October 13, 2005
New York Times to come clean... "Now"?

Holy smokes. Will the Wilson/Plame/Rove/Miller business take down the top brass of the New York Times too? Here's the NYT's "public editor" (ombudsman) Byron Calame in his weblog:

"The lifting of the contempt order against Judith Miller of The New York Times in connection with the Valerie Wilson leak investigation leaves no reason for the paper to avoid providing a full explanation of the situation. Now.

...So, assuming The Times publishes its explanation sometime in the next few days, I will be assessing it in my column on Sunday, Oct. 23. I will need time to do some reporting. A representative of Ms. Miller has indicated that she will talk to me at some point, and I would expect to have access to both Mr. Keller and Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the publisher, if necessary."

11 posted on 10/14/2005 12:36:32 AM PDT by STARWISE (Able Danger: DISABLED??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson