Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1035rep
We can agree that all things being equal (height and weight) the male in most instances would be stronger than the female.

Ummm. Not exactly. A smaller male can almost always defeat a larger female. Weight alone is not an indicator. The norm for percentage of body fat for women is 20-30%. For men, it's 10-20%. Women are carrying around more fat than men, which does nothing for their strength or stamina.

Your examples of a 5'2" policeman vs. a 5'7" police woman is unrealistic. Nobody of such short stature should be a police officer. We cannot have policemen the size of 13 year old girls.

130 pounders belong in the ballet, not in law enforcement - male or female.

The more of these ballerinas we have in law enforcement, the more thugs will be tempted to take a swat at them.

Each week we read in the papers of a thug disarming a practically helpless lady cop. When will we stop this PC madness? Or like in this article, everyone is surprised that a lady cop got hurt. Duh! Don't put ladies in uniform, and they won't get hurt.

Just as girls do not belong on the football team with the boys, ladies do not belong on the beat. If they do, nobody should be surprised when they get beat or killed.

928 posted on 10/16/2005 5:58:46 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies ]


To: Bon mots

You misquoted me, I said '5'5 but that's not important. There is no height requirement for police officers. There are plenty of male officers in CA that are of the stature I cited. You are set in your way of thinking..... so any further discussion would be rather pointless and I'm ready to move on.


952 posted on 10/16/2005 10:24:36 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson