Skip to comments.
Harrier destroyed by Afghan rocket
Telegraph News ^
| 16/10/2005
| Sean Rayment
Posted on 10/15/2005 9:01:12 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4
An RAF Harrier was destroyed and another has been damaged in a rocket attack in Afghanistan, it emerged yesterday.
The jets were on the ground at a military airfield at Kandahar in the south of the country when they were damaged early on Friday morning.
First reports of the attack from the Ministry of Defence made no mention of the damage to the aircraft and failed to disclose that one of them had been destroyed.
The RAF has only six Harrier GR7A jets - each worth £20 million - in Afghanistan, all of them from No 3 (Fighter) Squadron based at RAF Cottesmore, Lincolnshire.
The aircraft have been based at Kandahar since September last year and have been widely used on reconnaissance missions and to help special forces in the hunt for members of the ousted Taliban regime.
The MoD confirmed last night that the jets had been damaged.
One aircraft is being repaired at the airfield and the other has been replaced by another fighter which flew out from Britain on Friday evening.
A spokesman denied that the MoD had tried to conceal the fact that the aircraft had been damaged.
The attacked marks a significant escalation in the security situation in Afghanistan.
Next April more than 3,500 British troops will be deployed into the south of Afghanistan to launch operations against drug barons.
TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; gwot; harriers; kandahar; oef; raf; uktroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
The RAF has only six Harrier GR7A jets in Afghanistan
. . . and they're loud as hell and tear up the runway, but bless their hearts I'm glad they're here.
To: Cannonette
While one bunch was rocketing the south end of KAF,
another bunch was blowing up POL trucks over by the ANA camp, pretty close to where they blew some up last April. It was a busy night the other night, and we had similar excitement last night, which I will post as soon as Google News picks it up. . I'll be glad when it gets too cold for such foolishness.
2
posted on
10/15/2005 9:11:21 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(Kandahar Airfield -- “We’re not on the edge of the world, but we can see it from here")
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Next April more than 3,500 British troops will be deployed into the south of Afghanistan to launch operations against drug barons. Where are the Gurkhas? Just curious...
3
posted on
10/15/2005 9:17:25 PM PDT
by
SteveMcKing
("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
To: ChiefKujo; Eagle Eye; historian1944; Allegra; tomakaze; Justa; LFOD; Kewlhand`tek; Newbomb Turk; ...
4
posted on
10/15/2005 9:18:07 PM PDT
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(Kandahar Airfield -- “We’re not on the edge of the world, but we can see it from here")
To: Cannoneer No. 4
The Harriers *are* loud. Fun to watch, though.
I'd prefer to see cheaper air cover being used (not much threat of a dogfight over there), but hey, you go with the one who brung ya...
5
posted on
10/15/2005 9:20:49 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
The F-35 is supposed to replace the Harrier.
Eventually.
Maybe.
But not THIS soon.
Hope they bring more Harriers in soon.
6
posted on
10/15/2005 9:21:27 PM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Cellphones, the Wholly Roamin' Empire.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Thanks for the ping Cannoneer No. 4.
7
posted on
10/15/2005 9:22:02 PM PDT
by
fatima
(I close my eyes, only for a moment, and the moment's gone)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
I wonder how many will misread the thread's title as "Harriet destroyed by Afghan rocket"?
8
posted on
10/15/2005 9:24:57 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Givernment: The way the average voter spells "government.")
To: SteveMcKing
Where are the Gurkhas? Just curious Wouldn't that be fun to watch. Mr "Holy" Warrior, you are a disease, meet our cure, Mr Gurkha.
9
posted on
10/15/2005 9:33:23 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!.......Water Buckets UP!)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Man losing two of those has two tick the Brits off something fierce
10
posted on
10/15/2005 9:34:09 PM PDT
by
Americanwolf
(I Served proudly.... how dare you tell me I have no convictions...)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
To: Cannoneer No. 4
12
posted on
10/15/2005 9:48:15 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Whoa. I misread that headline. I thought it said Harriet destroyed by Afghan rocket. My first thought was, "Wow. And I thought Ann Coulter was being tough on her."
14
posted on
10/15/2005 9:49:54 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Shouldn't you be coming home soon?
Stay safe.
15
posted on
10/15/2005 9:55:06 PM PDT
by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
It was ON THE GROUND! The Telegraph implies it was shot out of the air!
To: snippy_about_it
Does anybody know if it was Harriers took off from Bergstrom AFB in Austin (now a Starbucksian int'l airport) to Germany annually?
We all showed up to watch the pairs (50 total) take off and they were loud as lightning, and sparky, too.
17
posted on
10/15/2005 10:01:02 PM PDT
by
txhurl
18
posted on
10/15/2005 10:05:56 PM PDT
by
Old Seadog
(Birthdays start out being fun. But too many of them will kill you..)
To: txflake
There's no mistaking a Harrier for anything else. They hover.
Here's what it looks like.
19
posted on
10/15/2005 10:09:02 PM PDT
by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
To: longtermmemmory
Well that is good news, it being on the ground. A simple russian RPG could hit a sitting duck. Hitting them in the air takes a lot more advanced system.
20
posted on
10/15/2005 11:04:26 PM PDT
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson