Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poor Children May Be Bused To Schools In Wealthy Areas (UK)
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 10-18-2005 | Liz Lightfoot

Posted on 10/17/2005 5:41:11 PM PDT by blam

Poor children may be bused to school in wealthy areas

By Liz Lightfoot, Education Correspondent
(Filed: 18/10/2005)

Free bus travel for children from council estates will be announced next week as part of the Government's effort to end the middle class stranglehold on popular schools.

"Choice advisers" will tell parents about schools outside their areas to which they can apply and help them through the admissions process.

Groups of schools will be allowed to test children and put them into ability bands, sharing out the most and least able so that their intakes reflect the profile of the local authority or national area.

Although the "fair banding" system will not be compulsory, the Government will strongly encourage schools to adopt it to end the so-called admission by postcode lottery, which rewards those families that can afford to move closest to schools with the best reputation. Research has shown that schools in middle class areas have a higher proportion of top band children.

Critics of banding say it is the antithesis of parental choice because a child living next door to a school could miss out on a place and end up being taken by bus to one farther away if too many pupils of the same ability lived in their area.

Ministers will argue that some city technology colleges and academies successfully use a "doughnut" system of banding. That gives more places in each band to children living near the schools but sets aside a proportion for those outside the geographical catchment area.

Ruth Kelly, the Education Secretary, told a conference in London yesterday that she was working on "how we can get families living on council estates to exercise their choice in as powerful a way as those from more privileged backgrounds".

She argues that parental choice has been concentrated in the hands of middle class families. She told the Labour Party conference last month that all parents should be able to choose the school that was right for their child.

"For too long, access to some schools was open only to those who could afford to buy an expensive house next to a good school, while the rest were told to accept what they were given," she said. "There was nothing fair about that approach."

Measures in the School Transport Bill, which failed to become law in the last parliamentary session from lack of time, will be revived. The Bill allows councils to charge parents for transport on a means-tested basis, introducing yellow bus-style services similar to those in America.

But Miss Kelly is likely to scrap the clause which would have allowed councils to charge poorer families if they had rejected a nearby school in favour of one farther away.

The proposals form part of Tony Blair's campaign to increase social mobility and bring fairness to public services. They demonstrate his frustration at his Government's inability to raise school standards in some of the toughest areas.

About 300 of 3,000 secondary schools already band children, usually according to a non-verbal reasoning test. But the present law on admissions says that the percentage of children allocated to each band must reflect the profile of applicants.

Sir Cyril Taylor, a Government adviser and chairman of the specialist schools and academies trust, believes that the present system leads to distortions because schools continue to reflect their local areas rather than the wider profile of abilities.

Middle class parents have nothing to fear, he said, because a greater social mixture of pupils will improve schools and give them more from which to choose. It would end the unfairness of narrow, shrinking catchment areas which deprive parents living just outside of any choice.

Sir Cyril said: "It is not some kind of social diktat or American-style enforced de-segregation but groups of schools working together and children travelling on yellow buses instead of parents having to drive them all over the place, polluting the atmosphere."

Middle class parents could also benefit from the greater choice and mobility because good schools in poor areas, such as Government's flagship academies, would be open to them, he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: areas; be; bused; children; may; neverworkedhere; poor; school; uk; wealthy; wontworkthere

1 posted on 10/17/2005 5:41:16 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
"Free bus travel for children from council estates will be announced next week as part of the Government's effort to end the middle class stranglehold on popular schools."

Hell, busing worked so well in the US, why not try it there.


I guess the obvious approach of "improve the crappy schools instead of shuffling students around" never occurred to them.
2 posted on 10/17/2005 5:43:00 PM PDT by flashbunny (Loyalty is earned, not handed out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

"It is not some kind of social diktat" because we say it's not, got that? We're going to spread the joy, and you're going to jolly well like it.


3 posted on 10/17/2005 5:46:58 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry (Esse Quam Videre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
>> Hell, busing worked so well in the US, why not try it there.

You beat me to that one.

Britannia is lost, who cares...?
4 posted on 10/17/2005 5:49:39 PM PDT by mmercier (I am just a dreamer, but you are just a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Yes, because busing works so well.... (obvious sarcasm)

Aaah, the same leftie braintrust trying to foist their ideas on the education system there, as we are plagued with them here.

5 posted on 10/17/2005 5:57:03 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
...part of the Government's effort to end the middle class stranglehold on popular schools.

Damn the awful WORKING middle class! /sarcasm

6 posted on 10/17/2005 6:17:33 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam


That's a horrible thing to do to those children. They won't be able to 'keep up with the jones' as they say.

Poor kids will always be put down and scorned by rich kids. It's going to be traumatic, who thought thought this was a good idea?


7 posted on 10/17/2005 6:25:44 PM PDT by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Instead of bringing academic success to the poor students, let's just spread the failure around, equally. Fair enough.


8 posted on 10/18/2005 12:11:39 AM PDT by sanormal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanormal
"Instead of bringing academic success to the poor students, let's just spread the failure around, equally. Fair enough."

Yup. That's exactly how the schools here were destroyed.

9 posted on 10/18/2005 7:02:45 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson