Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Study downplays effects of Prop. 77
Oakland Tribune ^ | 10/18/05 | Steve Geissinger

Posted on 10/18/2005 6:12:45 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's redistricting initiative in the upcoming special election would create some closer races — even in the populous Bay Area and Los Angeles Democratic strongholds — but would not shift decisive power to Republicans, a new report will show today. The study by the Institute of Governmental Studies at the University of California, Berkeley is foreshadowed in research papers obtained by the Oakland Tribune and roughly matches previous findings by institutes at Claremont McKenna College and the University of Southern California.

In a study of one East Bay legislative seat, currently held by Sen. Liz Figueroa, D-Fremont, undergraduate researcher Miguel Manriquez concluded that Schwarzenegger's reapportionment proposal would "not threaten the Democratic seat in (the East Bay's) Senate District 10."

"It may have more of an effect inland where there are more conservatives, but Los Angeles and the Bay Area are significantly Democratic and there would not be much of a threat to Democratic safety in these regions," he concludes.

Competitive boost

The Republican governor's initiative, Proposition 77 on the Nov. 8 special election ballot, would create a panel of retired judges to draw district lines for congressional, Assembly and Senate seats, rather than have the Democrat-dominated Legislature draw the lines.

Then the new lines would be taken before voters.

The Rose Institute at Claremont McKenna College, which has prepared GOP-supported redistricting plans in the past, recently concluded that Proposition 77 would lead to seven competitive Assembly districts, eight competitive state Senate districts and 10 competitive congressional districts.

The USC California Policy Institute reached a similar conclusion about competition.

In the 1990s, California had more than 50 legislative and congressional districts out of 153 that could be remotely described as competitive; that number has dropped to about 30.

Researchers believe Proposition 77 would boost that number back into the 50s.

California's current political maps are the product of a 2001 deal made by Democratic and Republican lawmakers to ensure easy re-election for incumbents.

Bruce Cain, who as head of the Institute of Governmental Studies at UC Berkeley oversaw the report due for release today, has concluded that the Rose Institute's numbers appear to be reasonable, based on his own research.

"Their numbers are an estimate; all our numbers are an estimate, but they're perfectly sensible," Cain told McClatchy News Service.

Don't expect a shake-up

Proposition 77 could even boost competitiveness around the edges of the Bay Area, such as in the southern Peninsula's 21st Assembly District, now held by Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, according to Berkeley researchers.

But despite the predicted increase in competitiveness, experts caution against expecting a dramatic shakeup of political power.

In Sacramento, Democrats are firmly in control of the Legislature and are expected to remain dominant in this Democratic-leaning state.

Supporters of Proposition 77 say it would bring much-needed reform, while opponents say it is unfair and unworkable.

On Monday, the two sides withheld judgment of the Berkeley study until its formal release today.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; calinitiatives; downplays; effects; prop77; shakeup; study

1 posted on 10/18/2005 6:12:45 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Seemingly lost in the discussion is the fundamental dishonesty in manipulating District shapes for political advantage by any party.

Whether it has any effect on results or not is irrelevant.
Not that I would put it past the manipulators to use undergraduate "researchers" to cook the procedural books to persuade the ignorant, the uninformed, that redistricting is not really a pressing or substantive issue.

2 posted on 10/18/2005 6:19:30 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

The IGS at Berkeley maintains the State Redistricting Database, so they probably know what they're talking about.


3 posted on 10/18/2005 6:26:52 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
The IGS at Berkeley maintains the State Redistricting Database, so they probably know what they're talking about.

Granted, they should know what they're talking about, but given past performance in the political arena, anything is possible.

4 posted on 10/18/2005 7:05:17 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"It may have more of an effect inland where there are more conservatives, but Los Angeles and the Bay Area are significantly Democratic and there would not be much of a threat to Democratic safety in these regions," he concludes.

Killing off strong conservative districts?

5 posted on 10/18/2005 8:10:51 AM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Just listened to David Horowitz on KSFO

Do we really want Don PeRATa or his ilk appointing the Republican selection of a Judge to serve as part of the panel?


6 posted on 10/18/2005 8:19:24 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Perata and Nunez get to choose. Ain't that sweet? Guess what party the two legislative reps on the Judicial Council are from? Yep. You guessed it. (Joe Dunn and Dave Jones). I'm voting with Horowitz. You read his rant, right?
See: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/10/9/215046.shtml

Look at all the RINOs, Dems and liberal groups lining up to support it. Below are some supporters listed in one of the articles posted here recently. Who's next? Arianna?

• Steve Poizner, named by Schwarzenegger to lead the Proposition 77 campaign
• John McCain, Republican Senator, Arizona
• Leon Panetta, former Democratic congressman and former chief of staff to President Clinton
• Joe Canciamilla, Democrat Assemblyman from Pittsburg
• Reed Hastings, Democrat, Netflix founder and former state Board of Education leader, (has given more than $400,000 to the pro-77 campaign).
• Al Checchi, former Democratic gubernatorial candidate
• Richard C. Atkinson, Democratic, former University of California president
• Frank Jordan, Democratic, former mayor of San Francisco
• Tom McEnery, former mayor of San Jose
• Common Cause
• California Public Interest Research Group -CAPIRG
• TheRestofUs.org.


7 posted on 10/18/2005 8:29:24 AM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Democrats and liberal groups opposing 77...
8 posted on 10/18/2005 9:22:39 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

http://www.yeson77.com/

9 posted on 10/18/2005 11:21:59 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
LOL. I saw that. An article said it is actress Golden Henning. I wonder if she is any relation to Jack Henning or Patrick Henning (Arnold's red-diaper EDD appointee)?

Did you notice the caption? Nothing like Poizner using this campaign to launch his IC campaign, huh? I didn't think they allowed that.

Paid for by Redistrict California - Yes on 77 with major funding provided by A.G. Spanos and STEVE POIZNER FOR INSURANCE COMMISSIONER.

10 posted on 10/18/2005 3:17:09 PM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Did you notice the caption? Nothing like Poizner using this campaign to launch his IC campaign, huh? I didn't think they allowed that.

---

Who's gonna do anything about it anyway?

They muzzled the FPPC, ;-). They may as well just euthanize it.


11 posted on 10/18/2005 3:37:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good point. I guess law enforcement only applies to us 'little people.'


12 posted on 10/18/2005 3:46:09 PM PDT by calcowgirl (CA Special Election: Yes, Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson