Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: irons_player
This article begins with a lie. Libby gave Miller a waiver so she could testify, a year before she went to jail. It was Miller's choice to ignore that waiver and refuse to testify. The bottom line is that Miller is a weird duck, as recent nasty reporting in the New York Times has demonstrated.

It is clear that the elements to prove violation of the "protect the covert operative" statute are not present. No one is going to get indicted for that, because the crime itself never occurred. It would be like charging bank robbery against a customer who walked in, and then walked out, without taking a single penny.

The only question is whether Fitzgerald will bring charges of perjury or obstruction against anyone -- including anyone in the press, Miller not excepted. And after that question comes the one whether anyone will ever be convicted of anything.

I'm willing to wager that NO ONE will be convicted of ANYTHING. However, the way the American press works, the story is the indictment, and the trial. Guilt is absolutely irrelevant.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Reporting on the 2,000th American Death in Iraq"

11 posted on 10/24/2005 2:28:28 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Quoted by Rush, again, this Thursday. Hoohah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

What do you make of the media attacks on Judith Miller?


15 posted on 10/24/2005 2:30:37 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson