Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/31/2005 6:41:09 AM PST by EarthStomper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EarthStomper

Whats more interesting is that the left proposes static solutions [Kyoto, et al] instead of re-investing dollars into new tech.


2 posted on 10/31/2005 6:42:35 AM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper
It almost makes up for their inflicting William Shatner on us, eh?

We'll keep the Captain if they'll take Sulu.

3 posted on 10/31/2005 6:44:15 AM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

as the whale oil supply dwindled 'twas petroleum that saved the whales.


Funny, I thought it was Scotty and transparent aluminum that saved the whales.


4 posted on 10/31/2005 6:47:54 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

"In fact, oil cost about 50% more per barrel in 1979-80 than now when adjusted for inflation."

This is a completely bogus statement.

That fact is the more you make of something, the cheaper it should be for the unit price based on the nature of mass production yet, this is not occuring. The problem is that we are making more and charging more if not in the taxes but the burdens and, the profit demands made on the company by stockholders.


6 posted on 10/31/2005 6:51:58 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

Oil prices are so volatile that it takes a lot to convince a company that it will be worth it to go after a difficult oil source.


7 posted on 10/31/2005 6:53:34 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

Oil sands is NOT oil shale.


8 posted on 10/31/2005 6:53:54 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper
Frequently Asked Questions About the Oil Sands

Win-Win option...use the tailings to bring NO above sea level.

9 posted on 10/31/2005 6:55:35 AM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

Tried to buy any whale oil lately?
At any price?

As recently as the '70's it was an important anti-scuff additive for high-performance engines, but now - we HAVE in fact run out of it.

Economists, unfortunately, only think in terms of economic factors, but the world we live in is not so pure and simple.


10 posted on 10/31/2005 6:56:17 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper
"Suncor's success can be measured by stock prices that have increased an incredible 400% in the past five years..."

While Suncor's process may or may not be economically feasible without government subsidies, it is absolutely silly to measure their technical success by their stock price!
Just plain silliness!

11 posted on 10/31/2005 6:59:56 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper
It was a tenet of the late great economist Julian Simon that we'll never run out of any commodity. That's because before we do the increasing scarcity of that resource will drive up the price and force us to adopt alternatives.

Anyone who paid attention in introductory economics knows this. Back in the late 70s and early 80s I used to laugh when liberals and the press would say things like "The day is coming when it will be announced that all the oil is gone. There will be riots at the gas stations and cars stranded all over our cities...."

12 posted on 10/31/2005 7:02:13 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

bttt


14 posted on 10/31/2005 7:04:08 AM PST by Tax-chick (I'm not being paid enough to worry about all this stuff ... so I don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

We will never run out of "oil". There is enough recoverable oil in shale and oil sand to last for hundreds of years.


15 posted on 10/31/2005 7:04:26 AM PST by BadAndy (Unnecessarily harsh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

The US should start programs on a comparable scale to the Manhattan project, to extract sand and shale oil. Even if the break even price is $15 or $20, and oil drops to that level, we should do this in the name of national security. No more blackmail or extortion by two bit dictators. No more hard currency leaving the US.


27 posted on 10/31/2005 7:32:49 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper
Oil, Oil Everywhere
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal ^ | Sunday, January 30, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST | PETER HUBER AND MARK MILLS
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1331914/posts

Anything into Oil(solution to dependence on foregn oil?)
DISCOVER Vol. 24 No. 5 ^ | May 2003 | Brad Lemley
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/897232/posts

30 posted on 10/31/2005 7:34:36 AM PST by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper
If gasoline and diesel stay in the plus $3.00 per gallon range for an extended length of time, I believe that butanol and bio-diesel will slowly supplant the traditional fuels in the market.  Read this link and check out what David Ramey is doing  as far as developing butanol as a fuel alternative.  Bio-diesel is even simpler to manufacture.
38 posted on 10/31/2005 8:31:52 AM PST by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

Thanks for the post.... Sure would like to see the day when we can tell the Arabs and Chavez in Venezuela to keep their oil.


39 posted on 10/31/2005 8:33:39 AM PST by democrats_nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EarthStomper

bttt


42 posted on 10/31/2005 9:25:47 AM PST by Born Conservative (Prince Charles is Camilla Parker Bowles' tampon - MadIvan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson