To: counterpunch
No tribe isn't a senator (thank GOD).
He is a blowhard form Harvard Law School. Even he has claimed that Roe was wrongly decided...
4 posted on
11/18/2005 9:43:09 AM PST by
matymac
(Living in the Heart of the Beast...the People's Republic of Cambridge...)
To: matymac
Yeah, I know.
it was a rhetorical question aimed at pointing out his irrelevance.
7 posted on
11/18/2005 9:44:58 AM PST by
counterpunch
(~ Let O'Connor Go Home! ~)
To: matymac
That's Hahvahd Law School.
12 posted on
11/18/2005 9:50:25 AM PST by
verity
(Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
To: matymac
Even he has claimed that Roe was wrongly decided...
You actually will be hard-pressed to find a liberal who will argue in favor of the actual decision. They're all in favor of the end result, but the decision itself is really quite poor. Even liberals in the '70s criticized it, saying that they were happy with the result, but not the reasoning - it was so bad that it would probably be reversed.
13 posted on
11/18/2005 9:50:27 AM PST by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: matymac
-"No tribe isn't a senator (thank GOD). He is a blowhard form Harvard Law School... who the RATs paraded in front of the Judiciary Committee during the Bork(SCOTUS) confirmation hearings, so he could 'Bork' the hell out of Bork.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson