Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: strategofr
Well, the best idea so far about deflecting these is, you send a ship up and just park it in the right location near the asteroid, and the gravitational attraction of even the wee little ship, pulls the asteroid ever so slightly off its previous trajectory. (This is called a gravitational tether, incidentally. No physical hook-up required).

If you do it in the most sensitive direction before a near gravitational slingshot past a larger body, you change its course through the deeper gravity well. Effectively, the course correction to put in before, is amplified by the next interaction. The best time to get one is several years before a close pass, letting the ship sent (which can be robotic of course) hover over it for several years. Even a small mass can do the job with enough lead time.

So no, don't wait to see if it is too close after the pass, calculate well and deflect years before the 2029 pass.

126 posted on 12/06/2005 9:04:23 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: JasonC

"So no, don't wait to see if it is too close after the pass, calculate well and deflect years before the 2029 pass."

Burp.


140 posted on 12/07/2005 2:02:15 AM PST by strategofr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: JasonC
I have also herd talk of chaulking an asteroid -- basically covering it or it's sunward side with white dust. The difference in how that reflectivity interacts with solar wind can make a continuous push over a period of years and alter the orbit in a precalculated manner.
154 posted on 12/07/2005 7:47:23 AM PST by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson