He means anywhere he does not have to see them. Build it where the hoipolio live.
Perhaps I've just missed it, but I have yet to see an environmentalist group promote a specific location as appropriate for a windfarm.
They are all in favor of them in the abstract, but invariably come up with reasons why a specific location is inappropriate.
Like their opposition to "final disposal" of nuclear waste. Anywhere that is suggested is opposed, on the theory that perhaps the location isn't absolutely perfect. Which only results in the dangerous stuff remaining in temporary storage locations which are infinitely worse.
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
Environmentalists generally demand perfection, no trade-offs allowed. Which, of course, allows them to remain ideologically pure. They refuse to muck about in the real world where real choices have to be made.