Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Intelligence Chief: U.S. Bases Near Russia a 'Threat'
AP ^ | December 19, 2005

Posted on 12/19/2005 6:07:13 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

MOSCOW — Russia's foreign spy chief said military forces from other countries deployed at bases along Russia's periphery are a threat to the nation, a Russian news agency reported Monday.

In comments that appeared directed at U.S. forces deployed on bases in former Soviet countries, the Interfax news agency quoted Sergei Lebedev, head of the Foreign Intelligence Service, as saying that Russia no longer had a "main adversary" as during the Cold War.

But "Russians cannot help but be concerned about new military bases and military contingents being deployed around our country," he was quoted as saying.

Russia has watched warily as the United States deployed forces to the Central Asian countries of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan and strengthened military and political ties with Ukraine and Georgia. Also, the three Baltic nations of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania joined NATO in 2004 over Moscow's strong objections.

Earlier this year, Uzbekistan evicted U.S. forces from a base there after Washington criticized Uzbekistan's authoritarian regime for a violent crackdown on a demonstration in May and other human rights abuses.

Kremlin leaders have also been jittery about mass protests that brought the opposition to power in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan over the past two years — protests that Russia says were backed by the West.

Lebedev did not name any specific countries that Russia considered a threat.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: belarus; china; coldwar2; communism; eurasia; kazakhstan; kgb; lebedev; militarybases; russia; sco; sovietunion; waaaahhh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
West exaggerates 'Russian espionage threat - "To my regret, it has become a rule to scare ordinary citizens abroad with Russian spies, who have allegedly made inroads into all of the agencies. There have been instances of local counter-intelligence services deliberately exaggerating the Russian espionage threat to show their relevancy, enhance their staff or secure more funds."
1 posted on 12/19/2005 6:07:14 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I suggest that we just merge with Russia and end this nonsense. There ain't a hill of beans worth of difference between our two countries anymore anyway.


2 posted on 12/19/2005 6:12:37 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
So. How close are we? Its a warm fuzzy feeling to be appreciated.


3 posted on 12/19/2005 6:12:42 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (Rock beats scissors, don't run with rocks. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Let's put some IRBM's on those bases and even the balance of power in the region.


4 posted on 12/19/2005 6:14:22 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Refresh my memory, wasnt Russia building a reactor for
our Iranian friend "Whathisname" Abershanamizabobo.
I hope we are a threat, and hopefully someday we will
bury their grandchildren!


5 posted on 12/19/2005 6:16:11 PM PST by claptrap (optional tag-line under reconsideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claptrap

We should also build bases in India.


6 posted on 12/19/2005 6:22:14 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

they already have a indian base at microsoft in seattle


7 posted on 12/19/2005 6:23:43 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I tend to agree, and it may even be practical.

As long as Russia is desperate for cash, they will keep playing games with Iran and China, exporting weapons and expertise. (Note, for example, the convoy of Russian "diplomats" who came under fire as they left Baghdad in 2003 - one can certainly wonder whether they "asked for it". Somehow.)

There is also pride to consider. Nostalgia works wonders, and nothing would fire up Russia like a good old fashioned Cold War II. That would sure put Chechnya back in to its place.


8 posted on 12/19/2005 6:26:02 PM PST by deflion1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deflion1

And the Rest of the USSR.

Russia is no longer desperate for cash. It has been on a building boom. Both Russia and China have been putting all of their spare money into thier respective militaries, and selling weapons is a way to get this money without setting off alarms in the West.


9 posted on 12/19/2005 6:33:46 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Let me suggest the issue really isn't the bases. Remember, Russia helped us secure them in the first place for the GWOT. However, the real issue is the American support for the color revolutions in countries bordering Russia. They feel like we have betrayed them after they helped us. Now they think we are going to fund NGOs to help overthrow the Russian government in the next election. How would we feel if the Mexican government provided $100 million for Hillary's run for president? I'm not saying supporting the color revolutions are wrong, but there is a price.


10 posted on 12/19/2005 6:34:50 PM PST by GarySpFc (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deflion1

Shiver me Timbers! You mean those remarkable Soviet Scud Missiles that Sodamn Insane bought and tossed at us?

If the soviets were so powerful the shepherding afghans wouldn't have kept them at bay for so long.

Too much reactor fallout in Russia for my taste.


11 posted on 12/19/2005 6:36:58 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (Rock beats scissors, don't run with rocks. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

I rather feel, though without good evidence, that Russian-Chinese cultural differences will continue to hamper meaningful cooperation. Their Armies may be ordered to train and to exercise side-by-side, but when you come down to it, it's like Israel and Iran trying to accomplish anything.

Or the U.S. and Canada.


12 posted on 12/19/2005 6:41:38 PM PST by deflion1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

you overlooked the mistake in the lead line

US bases a TREAT

they should be saying thank you!


13 posted on 12/19/2005 6:49:42 PM PST by jackson29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Really?
How about Kaliningrad and the russian military bases in Moldova (Basarabia) and Georgia?
They are full of s**t!
14 posted on 12/19/2005 8:37:36 PM PST by dbostan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The Russians had a base in Cuba for decades.

Screw 'em.


15 posted on 12/20/2005 12:17:53 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT; all4one; jer33 3; LucyT; Velveeta; Rushmore Rocks; jerseygirl; MamaDearest

Ping


16 posted on 12/20/2005 4:57:51 AM PST by nw_arizona_granny (My prayers go out to all of our Military members and those who are ill. Merry Christmas!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Why not just start WW3, I'm sure the Islamics will appreciate your efforts.


17 posted on 12/20/2005 6:04:31 AM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: claptrap

Its a light water reactor with a rod exchange program run by US officials. The EU is (with Washington's backing) offerring to build a second one for free (and I'm sure we'll foot at least some of that bill). Your memory is refreshed.


18 posted on 12/20/2005 6:05:36 AM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
We should also build bases in India.

First we'd have to stop arming nuclear islamic Pakistan who is building the Iranina, Saudi, Egyptian and formerly Lybian nuclear programs.

19 posted on 12/20/2005 6:06:22 AM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Both Russia and China have been putting all of their spare money into thier respective militaries

Again, not true. China, mostly. Russia, hardly. That's why the airforce in Russia is receiving 20 new planes this year, from all those "resources". At least get the facts right. You carp the same lines even when proven wrong. At least adapt your lines to reality.

20 posted on 12/20/2005 6:08:05 AM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson