Pretty slimey but they are not denying it anymore.
The executive editor, Tom Marquardt, recently wrote a personal piece where he denied any bias in the MSM and wanted people to send him examples of bias when they think they see it.
WOULD this qualify?
It seems that they are so blinded at the editorial staff that they refuse to look at facts although I realize "facts can be challenging", especially when they don't support your own particular bias.
Might be a good opportunity to send a few letters to the editor...
cappletts@capitalgazette.com
Thanks for the pings to this story.
Interesting that this "editorial" isn't screaming the word 'entrapment' as they would if the party affiliations were reversed.