And let's not forget that every leak is has a "hot off the press" book attached to it.
Better yet, they'll be easier to find and question.
A friend of mine just used this particular article to rebutt a libs accusations of Bush's 'illegal' wiretaping. Has any of it since been legitimately debunked? She was provided with evidence (links to thinkprogress site) debunking the claim that Clinton and Carter had done the same thing. That, "Bush cannot claim "inherent authority" over warrantless electronic surveillance because there is already statutory law prohibiting it in the FISA law. The Bush administration's claim is utterly bogus on these circumstances."
Is it also true that those in congress who knew about the wiretaps were NOT able to do anything because they were sworn to secrecy?
anyone?