Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Rangel's Wampum Linked to Scandal

This header got a big laugh when posted last year.

Seemed destined to become a FR classic euphemism.

1 posted on 01/01/2006 7:24:29 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Liz

The operative phrase here:
"To my knowledge"
You're busted Charlie, and we know this is how you are going to try to wiggle out from under it.


2 posted on 01/01/2006 7:30:23 AM PST by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
You imply this guilt-by-association

So how's it feel when the cannon's pointing at you?

4 posted on 01/01/2006 7:50:33 AM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

ROFLMAO!
Stuck pigs sure scream loud.
Rangel = POS


6 posted on 01/01/2006 8:03:30 AM PST by Fudd Fan (God bless President Bush! (Water Bucket Brigade member - MOOSEMUSS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Image hosted by Photobucket.com or have ever, to my knowledge, taken a dime from him.

hillery and alger hiss would be proud of him...

7 posted on 01/01/2006 8:04:05 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

I love to see him in jail.


8 posted on 01/01/2006 8:04:31 AM PST by bmwcyle (Evolution is a myth -- Libertarians just won't evolve into Conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
HOW DOES IT FEEL, CHUCK??

Tom DeLay's former aide pled guilty to some crime...BUT THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA KEEPS TOOTING HIS DeLAY CONNECTION!

Of course, the crimes he admitted to were committed after he left DeLay's employ, but hey, if the LSM can create an association in the minds of the public, maybe DeLay can be demonized.

9 posted on 01/01/2006 8:04:51 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
"Contributions by Native Americans to my political campaigns have nothing to do with Abramoff....."

Those ripoffs are a completely separate issue. Many Native Americans seem to be obsessed in giving their limited funds to any assortment of democrats. They need to use their money on something other than buying congress people.
10 posted on 01/01/2006 8:04:53 AM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
"I have worked on behalf of the interests of Native Americans in New York and throughout the nation"

ahem, Rangel represents only one district in Manhattan... Sounds like Charlie has huge delusions of grandeur regarding who he represents. Unless there are still native Americans in Manhattan...

11 posted on 01/01/2006 8:08:31 AM PST by Fudd Fan (God bless President Bush! (Water Bucket Brigade member - MOOSEMUSS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Do you think the Post just did a hatchet job on Rangel?


26 posted on 01/01/2006 9:03:40 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

If the Democrats were to regain control of the House, idiot Rangel would become the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Doesn't that thought just warm your heart?


36 posted on 01/01/2006 9:40:36 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
"I have worked on behalf of the interests of Native Americans in New York and throughout the nation because of my longstanding solidarity with the aspirations of Native Americans."

Hopefully, he's planning to quit congress as soon as he collects enough to build his very own casino.

37 posted on 01/01/2006 9:44:06 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

The whole "Native American" gambling industry has become a source of political corruption arising out of liberal- guilt from the sins of the pale-faces and out of pure greed.


42 posted on 01/01/2006 10:30:35 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

The MSM is up to it's old tricks again, claiming Abramoff is a GOP lobbyist.

FYI:

Nearly three dozen members of Congress, including leaders from both parties, pressed the government to block a Louisiana Indian tribe from opening a casino while the lawmakers collected large donations from rival tribes and their lobbyist, Jack Abramoff.

Many intervened with letters to Interior Secretary Gale Norton within days of receiving money from tribes represented by Abramoff or using the lobbyist's restaurant for fundraising, an Associated Press review of campaign records, IRS records and congressional correspondence found.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, an Illinois Republican, held a fundraiser at Abramoff's Signatures restaurant in Washington on June 3, 2003, that collected at least $21,500 for his Keep Our Majority political action committee from the lobbyist's firm and tribal clients.

Seven days later, Hastert wrote Norton urging her to reject the Jena tribe of Choctaw Indians' request for a new casino. ...

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid sent a letter to Norton on March 5, 2002 ... The next day, the Coushattas issued a $5,000 check to Reid's tax-exempt political group, the Searchlight Leadership Fund. A second Abramoff tribe sent another $5,000 to Reid's group. Reid ultimately received more than $66,000 in Abramoff-related donations between 2001 and 2004. ...

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., the former Senate GOP leader, wrote Norton on March 1, 2002, to "seriously urge" she reject the Jena casino. Lott received $10,000 in donations from Abramoff tribes just before the letter and $55,000 soon after. Lott's office said he sent the letter because his state's Choctaw tribe and a casino company were concerned about losing business.

Then-Sen. John Breaux (news, bio, voting record), D-La., wrote Norton on March 1, 2002. Five days later the Coushattas sent $1,000 to his campaign and $10,000 to his library fund, tribal records show.

Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., wrote Norton on June 14, 2001, one of the first such letters. Cochran's political committee got $6,000 from Abramoff tribes in the weeks before the letter, and another $71,000 in the three years after.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., who was engaged in a tight re-election race in 2002, sent her letter March 6, 2002. That same day, the Coushattas sent $2,000 to her campaign and she received $5,000 more by the end of that month. By year's end, the total had grown to at least $24,000.

The money involved totals to over $800,000, far more than the cash output involved in the Keating 5 savings-and-loan scandal in the 80s. Unlike the Keating scandal, where John McCain was the only Republican involved in the cash-for-influence scandal, Abramoff made sure that he worked both parties in depth to maximize his ability to influence the bureaucracy at Interior.

There's more:

Senator Dorgan (Dem-ND) held a fundraiser in Abramoff's skybox. One of the ND tribes paid for the use of the box for Dorgan's fundraiser. (AP)

Dorgan collected $11,500 plus in political donations from the Abramoff's partner who was representing the Mass. Mashpee tribe after he pushed for federal recognition of them .(AP)

Rangel has taken $27,000 from the Mississippi Choctaws and another $9,000 from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians in California since 1999. Both tribes are eager to cash in on casino gambling and are clients of the indicted Abramoff. The tribes funneled $27,000 to Rangel's leadership PAC - used to help elect other Democrats - and routed another $9,000 directly to the Harlem Democrat's re-election campaign. A study by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics found that 210 members of Congress have received campaign cash from Abramoff, his associates or his Indian-tribe clients. (NY Post)


45 posted on 01/03/2006 1:16:01 PM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Rangel - "I have never had sex with that man, Jack Abramoff."


47 posted on 01/03/2006 4:26:54 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Charlie didn't take any money. It was given to him.


48 posted on 01/03/2006 4:28:39 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (Don't have an annus horribilis in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson