[Fruitbat]

These scenarios don't make any sense. A terrorist act isn't a terrorist act if it can be confused for a natural event (such as forest fires). Terrorists *want* to be able to claim credit for their attacks. Otherwise, the attack is worthless. A terrorist act must also be unusual, not something that can happen every day by accident (such as chemical leaks). The attack must reveal some fundamental flaw in the security structure of the nation (again, not something that could easily happen by accident). Otherwise, the terrorists cannot hope to affect our behavior, which is the aim of terrorism. No single attack could do any real physical or economic damange to our nation, short of a nuclear or radiological detonation in one of the major cities.

Interesting post!

[nw_arizona_granny]

Hello, welcome to our collection of news.

If you follow the trials, sooner or later, the attacks that appear as terrorist to us, but the Government says is not, will suddenly show up as an arrest and be tried as a terrorist.

Or as I posted the link above this post, in the post of several links, the man who tried to kill all the people at the University of North Carolina a couple weeks ago and said
he did it to us, for the rest of the muslims, is not going to be charged as a terrorist.....

North Carolina does not have that law on the books.....

So we have a terrorist, who has freely confessed and no law
to cover it.......

Glad to see you posting, join in, we miss a lot of the news,
there isn't time to get it all.