Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham

I'm rather interested to know what our plans are in a Nuclear war; whom we presume would be attacked first and what our planned reaction would be.


6 posted on 01/07/2006 6:01:17 AM PST by x5452
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: x5452
In such a nightmare scenario, I am only comforted by the idea that it's mostly liberals that a clustered in the heavily populated cities... hehe ;)
7 posted on 01/07/2006 6:16:01 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: x5452
US plans varied with the era. As best as I recall, the Soviet assessment of US and NATO intentions made public is correct for the time period, that the US and NATO would strike deep in Poland with nuclear weapons aimed at Soviet assembly areas and lines of communications.

Expecting equivalent Soviet restraint, US planners preferred to keep a nuclear war in Europe limited to Europe and would have avoided nuclear strikes on Soviet home territory for fear of a retaliatory strike on the US homeland. Similarly, US planners did not want to nuke Soviet armies on the territory of West Germany, an ally, or even in East Germany, as a concession to the West Germans. By geographic elimination, that meant that the Poles would get nuked.

Notably, the US plans for such a use of nuclear weapons were as a defensive response to a Soviet first use of nuclear weapons on West Germany and invasion by Soviet armies. For the Poles and Germans, the provocative part is that the Soviet plans projected first use of nuclear weapons on West Germany in an offensive war, with a nuclear stricken Poland an acceptable price.

In the Soviet view, civilian casualties from nukes used by the US and NATO on Poland (a Soviet ally) and by the Soviets on West Germany (an enemy) were affordable so long as Soviet home territory was safe. With Soviet armies on the Rhine and in effective control of the continent, the Soviets would have seen themselves as the winners, notwithstanding millions of dead German and Polish civilians.

There is another wrinkle that seems not to have been mentioned so far. In order to limit collateral civilian casualties, the US developed smaller yield nuclear weapons and wanted to develop a neutron mini-nuke with small blast damage and virtually no fallout. Naturally, the Soviet Union denounced the project and the Left in the US and Europe opposed it fiercely, so the neutron bomb was not developed in the West. In the context of Soviet war plans, the civilians spared by the neutron bomb would mostly have been Poles.
12 posted on 01/07/2006 6:55:50 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: x5452
I'm rather interested to know what our plans are in a Nuclear war; whom we presume would be attacked first and what our planned reaction would be.
---
I know that to this day the United States has never renounced its right to the first use on nuclear weapons. Thank God we will never know what would have been result of such a war.

AS aside note, Radek Sikorsky lived in the U.S. during most of the eighties and nineties and wrote articles occasionally for National Review.
14 posted on 01/07/2006 8:21:49 AM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson