Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s wrong with a probe of election accuracy?
Arizona Capitol Times ^ | 30 Dec 2005 | John Semmens

Posted on 01/11/2006 3:47:33 PM PST by John Semmens

Senate President, Ken Bennett, R-1, finds it “troubling.” Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas says he is “concerned” and has “serious questions about legality and ethics.” From the portentous rhetoric, a person could not be blamed for fearing that organized crime may have seized control of Arizona’s government, which millions in public funds have gone missing, or that some other major calamity has befallen us.

It should come as a great source of relief to discover that all this hyperventilating is over the efforts of Sen. Jack Harper, R-4, to investigate a voting irregularity from the 2004 election.

In the 2004 District 20 Republican primary, Anton Orlich appeared to have narrowly edged-out John McComish for a spot on the November general election ballot. Naturally, with a race so close, a recount was undertaken. During this recount, 489 additional votes turned up and reversed the outcome.

Karen Osborne, Maricopa County Elections director, attributed the discrepancy to voters using improper pens to fill out their ballots. She speculates that the writing may have been too faint to be read by the original voting machines, but were picked up by the more sensitive devices used in the recount.

Whether the marks detected by the more sensitive devices were legitimate additional votes or merely stray marks and whether the voting machines used in the various precincts are working properly would seem to be reasonable questions. Elections provide for a peaceful means of determining who will take office and make the laws. It is essential that the vote counting be accurate.

Answering these questions and confirming the accuracy of the election process is the focus of Sen. Harper’s investigation. It seems fair enough. What’s the fuss all about?

Well, apparently, Sen. Harper has shown too much initiative. The analysis of the ballots and the machines costs $3,000. The senator’s request for funding from the Legislature was rejected by Sen. Bennett. A New Times staff member instead helped to fund the investigation.

Douglas Jones, a computer expert from the University of Iowa has been hired to conduct the investigation. Mr. Jones has had previous experience as an election observer in Eastern Europe. Thus far, he has begun examining the voting machines, but Maricopa County Treasurer David Schweikert has denied him access to the ballots. Mr. Schweikert says he will wait for a court to order him to provide access to the ballots. Sen. Harper’s subpoena isn’t good enough.

Sen. Harper’s intent is worthy. His ingenuity in pursuing a solution that does not require the use of public funds is commendable. The participation of the New Times ensures full disclosure of whatever results are derived from the investigation. Why is he being harassed?

The best that can be said for his detractors is that they may be motivated by petty concerns over turf. Sen. Bennett may be miffed that a lower ranking colleague hasn’t simply taken “no” for an answer from him. The county attorney may view investigations as his prerogative.

Sen. Harper has done no harm. He may have done some good. Use of a word like “unethical” to describe his actions is a smear. Too often differences of opinion over whether something ought to be done or how it should be done degrade into assaults on someone’s character. This is not the way to run a government.

John Semmens

Chandler


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: accuracy; election; recounts; votecounts

1 posted on 01/11/2006 3:47:35 PM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I seem to recall that the Republican candidate against our current Governor (Janet Naplitano (D)), had a lead until suddenly...(missing) (or late) (or manufactured)votes (from one of the Indian Reservations) for Janet Baby showed up giving her a narrow victory. Dems seem to find just enough votes somewhere, once they know how much they are losing by...makes you wonder doesn't it?


2 posted on 01/11/2006 4:07:59 PM PST by borisbob69 (Old shade is better than new shade!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: borisbob69
...makes you wonder doesn't it?

No, there is nothing to wonder about, It's ELECTION FRAUD, A long standing Democrat tradition, Check what going on at the trial in Wisconsin even as we speak..

What trial? oh what a surprise, the media seems to have missed it..

3 posted on 01/11/2006 4:25:03 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

It's good enough for them! Why cant we have this low tech solution to vote fraud?????????????????????????
Eliminate absentee ballots EXCEPT for active military.

One citizen....One Vote!!!!!!!No whinny cry baby tactics!!!! No Fraud!!!!!!

ABC CBS NBC CNN its all the SAME, Propaganda.
Might as well call them all AmeriJazerra.
Show them how much Psychological Gravitas Hugh Bris has. Vote with your remote! Shut down the Alphabet channels. *"aka the ENEMEDIA

He's Got A Plan
Zippo Hero

Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes

4 posted on 01/11/2006 4:34:06 PM PST by rawcatslyentist ("Monkeys are not Donkeys, quit messing with my mind"-- Professor Farnsworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

Dead people are voting Memphis. The Ford family owns a mortuary. Is it any wonder?


5 posted on 01/11/2006 8:38:55 PM PST by oyez (Appeasement is death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson