Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000

New York Times planning non-stop coverage. Developing . . . . . . .


3 posted on 01/17/2006 8:43:48 PM PST by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neodad
What kind of non stop coverage? Typical Clintonian where the attack is on the Special Prosecutor and defend the Clintons and their supporters?
9 posted on 01/17/2006 8:48:59 PM PST by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: neodad

"New York Times planning non-stop coverage. Developing . . . . . ."

Uh-huh.


76 posted on 01/18/2006 8:03:00 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("We don't need POLITICIANS...we need STATESMEN.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: neodad

"New York Times planning non-stop coverage"

And I know how to turn lead into gold!


77 posted on 01/18/2006 8:05:54 AM PST by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: neodad
New York Times planning non-stop coverage. Developing . . . . . . .

Funny you should mention that...I just left this thread:

2002 Memo Doubted Uranium Sale Claim (NYT desperate for news. Resorts to rehashing lies.)

ROTFLMAO!

80 posted on 01/18/2006 9:02:46 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson