Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coalition vows to defeat harsh immigration bill [HR 4437]
Reuters ^ | 1/19/06 | Alan Elsner

Posted on 01/19/2006 5:13:36 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com

A U.S. coalition of business, labor unions and religious groups launched a campaign on Thursday to defeat a bill backed by Republicans that would turn some 11 million illegal immigrants into felons. [NOTE: I believe that was downgraded to a misdemeanor.]

The coalition of 24 organizations, many of which rarely agree on politics or economics, denounced the bill passed by the House of Representatives last month [HR 4437] and called on the Senate to enact legislation to include a guest worker program and a path for illegal aliens to gain legal status.

... "We are extremely disappointed with the proposal that passed the House last month," said Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce which represents some 3 million businesses...

... Andy Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, which has 1.8 million members, called for comprehensive reform to take control of the border and provided a way for illegal aliens to gain legal status...

... Other groups joining the coalition include associations representing builders and contractors, health care providers, the hotel and restaurant industries, Latino organizations, farm workers, the American Jewish Committee and Catholic bishops...

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; hr4437; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigrationplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Note that they support the McCain-Kennedy mass amnesty.

Note also that the AFL-CIO opposes a guest worker plan.

I've tried and failed to find any kind of a press release announcing this coalition at uschamber.com or seiu.org.

I'd really like to find the URL or at least the name of this new coalition.

See also this older coalition:

immigrationforum.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabid=581

1 posted on 01/19/2006 5:13:38 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; A CA Guy; ...

ping


2 posted on 01/19/2006 5:16:39 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

I think there are more important national issues than turning some 11 million illegal immigrants into felons too.


3 posted on 01/19/2006 5:17:10 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

The only interest group in favor of the bill:

250 million Americans who love their country and support the rule of law.

C of C - anything for a buck. They'd support handing the country over to China if they'd be guaranteed a profit.


4 posted on 01/19/2006 5:20:59 PM PST by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

Start building the fence.

It should be made a felony for Criminals who overstay their visas and Invaders.

I believe we should give amnesty to these poor CRIMINALS or INVADERS.
This should be a 2 week amnesty to get the heck out of our Country.
The ones who ignore this amnesty should be buried in a tent city jail and fined $10,000 or buried elsewhere.
All aiders and abettors of these CRIMINALS or INVADERS should get 1 year in a tent city jail and a $10,000 fine for each CRIMINAL aided.
Those in government should be the first ones charged.


5 posted on 01/19/2006 5:21:22 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or a Fool from any side.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
I think there are more important national issues than turning some 11 million illegal immigrants into felons too. not in my book
6 posted on 01/19/2006 5:21:45 PM PST by jneesy (certified southern right wing hillbilly nutjob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Interesting. You know that advocating violent overthrow of the government is illegal too, right?


7 posted on 01/19/2006 5:23:28 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jneesy
What "book" is that? How about the 40 million plus unborn children killed since Roe v. Wade - that's not just slightly more important?
8 posted on 01/19/2006 5:24:17 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"You know that advocating violent overthrow of the government is illegal too, right?"

Not if he's in New Hampshire, where the right of the people to rebel against the government is a part of the state constitution. :-)
9 posted on 01/19/2006 5:29:41 PM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent

It's against the UNITED STATES Constitution (see e.g. Civil War too ; )


10 posted on 01/19/2006 5:32:27 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"How about the 40 million plus unborn children killed since Roe v. Wade - that's not just slightly more important?"

Reversing Roe V Wade tomorrow won't stop abortions. What it would do is make some states abortion states, other states non-abortion states, and the rest at some point in between. This is doable now, while the other takes time and starts with getting like-minded people on the SCOTUS. We -can- work on more than one thing at a time, you know.

The fact remains, this is important. In fact, this is as vital to our national security as any defense bill passed in the last 20 years. If we don't start securing our borders and ports, we may as well surrender publicly to Osama and hope for the best.
11 posted on 01/19/2006 5:33:05 PM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy 342 U.S. 580 (1952) held that advocating violent overthrow of the Government is unprotected speech.
12 posted on 01/19/2006 5:34:30 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

This legislation is going to be interesting to watch as it makes it way through the senate.


13 posted on 01/19/2006 5:35:16 PM PST by tropical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
We disagree (obviously). I think overturning Roe v. Wade is much more important if, for no other reason, the number of innocent human lives taken pale in comparison.
14 posted on 01/19/2006 5:35:57 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent

P.S. we can keep terrorists out of the U.S. short of closing the borders and throwing every illegal alien out.


15 posted on 01/19/2006 5:38:27 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
I think there are more important national issues than turning some 11 million illegal immigrants into felons too.

That's not going to happen, if you were paying attention you'd know Sensenbrenner attempted to strike that provision making illegals potential felons but the democrats all voted against it because they wanted to kill the whole bill. It will be reduced to a misdemeanor by the Senate and approved in conference.

And btw, I can't think of anything more important than to start enforcing all of the nation's laws, including those related to immigration.

16 posted on 01/19/2006 5:41:37 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
"It's against the UNITED STATES Constitution"

Really? Where does it say that? The only place I see something like that mentioned is in the Declaration of Independence. Pray tell, under what circumstances was that document written?

"(see e.g. Civil War too ; )"

Heh, citing an illegal invasion of a foreign entity along with an attempted genocide (see: Sherman's correspondance with his wife) isn't about to win me over.

All that aside, the original poster wasn't talking about overthrowing the government, but rather, prosecuting those who have and continue to explicitly aid illegal immigrants. I would imagine he's talking about BP agents who've taken bribes and public officials who've actively assisted illegal aliens.
17 posted on 01/19/2006 5:41:51 PM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

WHAT? Are you an aider or abettor of these criminals?


18 posted on 01/19/2006 5:48:43 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or a Fool from any side.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

It seems like he is.


19 posted on 01/19/2006 5:52:43 PM PST by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1560900/posts

lol That thread will tell you all you need to know.


20 posted on 01/19/2006 5:59:40 PM PST by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson