Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazon Fishbowl Bill Maher - Stephen King interview (King Slams Bush on Wire Tap, Maher Backs POTUS)
Amazon.com ^ | January 25th 2006 | unknown

Posted on 01/25/2006 1:31:25 AM PST by Mad Dawgg

Amazon is launching a new show via the internet called Amazon Fishbowl here is the blurb:

-------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to the sneak preview of Amazon Fishbowl with Bill Maher, a weekly original program coming to Amazon.com this June. Every week throughout the summer, the show will feature live performances from renowned musicians and thought-provoking interviews with authors, directors, and actors.

Beginning June 1, the show will be streamed every Thursday at Amazon.com at 8 p.m. Pacific / 11 p.m. Eastern. Until then, you're invited to enjoy the sneak preview in the video player below.

-------------------------------------------------------

The featured interview is with Stephen King, his new book CELL deals with cell phones and technology and zombies (hey you can't make this stuff up) anyhow Maher and King talk about technology and King Slams Bush about the wire taps, and to my astonishment Maher backs the President!

You can see it for yourself using the link above.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amazon; billmaher; maher; nettv; streamingvideo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
Interesting that Amazon is doing this web broadcast and still more interesting that Maher thinks the POTUS is right on the "wiretapping" issue
1 posted on 01/25/2006 1:31:28 AM PST by Mad Dawgg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

I don't like the whole wire-tapping thing. I'm not with Bush on this.


2 posted on 01/25/2006 1:40:17 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

I'm with you.


3 posted on 01/25/2006 1:42:33 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Really? I think you should be.

None of the calls being monitored are domestic only calls. Foreigners have no right to expect that their calls into the US are private. Noone accepting an incoming international call, or making an outgoing international call has any 'expectation of privacy' either in fact or in law.

The courts have decided this one more than once.

L

4 posted on 01/25/2006 1:46:58 AM PST by Lurker (Liberal policies break hearts and destroy lives, no matter which Party tries them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

Unless you are conducting evil deeds on the telephone/internet, you have nothing to fear.


5 posted on 01/25/2006 1:47:59 AM PST by Emmet Fitzhume ("Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Thing is, I'm not a foreigner. I'm an American living abroad.

I don't like the government being able to do this.

I will like it even less once Hillary is doing it in 2009.


6 posted on 01/25/2006 1:52:07 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
As far as Stephen King goes, his new book makes me think of that episode of the Family Guy,

Stephen King: (siezing a lamp off the table) Now for my 300th novel, a couple... is attacked... by a giant lamp monster.
Editor: You're not even trying anymore are you?
Stephen King: (waving the lamp menacingly) Grawwrrl!

As far as Maher, I think the guy's gotten a bad rap. He is liberal, but he's smart and honest about it. I'm glad he's still speaking his mind, even if it's unpopular.

7 posted on 01/25/2006 1:52:11 AM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

Hillary would do it and already has, (filegate) but she would not do it for our country's defense, and she would deny it to the end. Bush is open about it.


8 posted on 01/25/2006 1:56:54 AM PST by Rumple4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Not to be flippant, but there's an easy fix to your concerns. Don't call members of Al Qaida. If they call you, don't answer. It's that easy.

NSA has neither the authority nor the manpower to track any more than that, and I'm sure even that additional load is tough for them. To think that they've got time or inclination to sift through random civilian calls for no reason while they're in the middle of hunting terrorists is absurd.

9 posted on 01/25/2006 1:57:43 AM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Bill Maher backs the President??? Well, it doesn't change my opinion of Maher. He's still a liberal dink--DU material.


10 posted on 01/25/2006 1:59:18 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

Well, you if you are living outside of the USA, the country you are in probably doesn't have the protective rights that the USA has, even on domestic wiretapping. Even countries like the UK, France, etc. are much more lenient and I don't know of any country that requires warrants to monitor outgoing or incoming calls. So even if the USA wasn't listening in on your calls, the country you are living in could. The USA is probably the most restrictive country in the world on warrants on eavesdropping


11 posted on 01/25/2006 1:59:36 AM PST by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; Allegra
Re: Maher thinks the POTUS is right on the "wiretapping" issue

Even a dead, gay, Commie Nun's clock is right twice a day...

Hummmmm? Yet, Wild Bill Maher is only right once in a blue moon!

12 posted on 01/25/2006 2:00:29 AM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rumple4

"Bush is open about it."

Ha. hehe. He didn't mean to be.


13 posted on 01/25/2006 2:05:23 AM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe; Prodigal Son
Well, you if you are living outside of the USA, the country you are in probably doesn't have the protective rights that the USA has, even on domestic wiretapping.

Exactly. Most of the world is clueless as to what this scandal is about. Aside from a tiny handful of countries, the idea of getting a warrent to do eavesdrop is an alien concept. They just do it, and they don't give a hoot what you think about it. Unless PS is living in an English speaking country, it's about certain that his host goverment can and will eavesdrop on him at will.

14 posted on 01/25/2006 2:05:37 AM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
It's been going on since the Carter administration. Get over it. Your rights are not being violated. No court in the land has ever said they have.

Domestic 'wiretapping' laws don't apply. They never have. Foreign nationals and Americans living abroad do not have a 'right' to private phone calls into the US. Your phone calls are broadcast into the atmosphere at satellites whirling in orbit 22,000 miles over your head. That makes what you say 'public'.

Anyone with a properly tuned reciever can 'listen in'. The US government just happens to own some really bitching recievers. All the NSA does is monitor those satellites, and they do that from listening posts that aren't even on US soil. There are no US laws being broken, or even bent here.

Now, if you don't like that you can write your Congresscritter. That's your right. Get them to change the laws so that the US Government can't monitor any foreign signals at all. Somehow I think that once you've had a chance to mull over what that means you'll be alright with US policy in this regard.

L

15 posted on 01/25/2006 2:06:48 AM PST by Lurker (Liberal policies break hearts and destroy lives, no matter which Party tries them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

I too am an American living abroad.

I don't particularly like the fact that my calls to the US might be monitored. But I'd like it a WHOLE LOT LESS if these calls and others like them were simply ignored. That wouild be a Presidential deriliction of duty of impeachable proportions, IMHO.

How many lives are you willing to sacrifice for your potential aesthetic sense of communications privacy?


16 posted on 01/25/2006 2:08:01 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

I too am an American living abroad.

I don't particularly like the fact that my calls to the US might be monitored. But I'd like it a WHOLE LOT LESS if these calls and others like them were simply ignored. That wouild be a Presidential deriliction of duty of impeachable proportions, IMHO.

How many lives are you willing to sacrifice for your potential aesthetic sense of communications privacy?


17 posted on 01/25/2006 2:08:07 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son; stuartcr

IMHO, this whole wire tapping thing has been blown out of proportion. Fortunately, the wire tapping seems to have stopped other things from being blown out of proportion.


18 posted on 01/25/2006 2:08:18 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
I will like it even less once Hillary is doing it in 2009.

If Her Heinous were to take over in 2009, nothing done now would make a bit of difference either way. She would govern by the Begala Doctrine—Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool. She would not allow the commoners in Congress to get in the way again like they did with her socialized medicine power grab.

19 posted on 01/25/2006 2:09:20 AM PST by Dahoser (Time to condense the nonsense: Terry Tate for Congressional Linebacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son

Then the thing to do is make sure Hillary isn't elected.


20 posted on 01/25/2006 2:15:01 AM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson