Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SAJ

I believe your comments describe accurately one possibility. I am still reminded that it doesn't take all that many people to control the masses.

When those without guns start being mowed down by those with them, it sorta puts a dent in your plans to rebel.

I know big money talks. Big guns talk louder.


12 posted on 01/27/2006 11:35:28 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

The soldiers can't be everywhere. A coordinated protest in many rural districts would work. During the long, long history of China, peasant revolts frequently brought down regimes.


15 posted on 01/27/2006 11:46:41 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Ordinarily, D.O., I'd agree with you straight off. China, I think, is a different situation though.

That nation has more unemployed peasants in the rural areas than the U.S. has population. Plain fact, no spin at all. The question is: what's to become of them?

Well, from the ChinCom gov's standpoint at least, if they'd care to sit on their butts until doomsday, that's fine; we'll tax some other segment of the economy so they don't run out of rice.

However, that's not the way it's playing out. The rural poor are moving to the cities en masse, and even in direct defiance of the Party's assorted edicts. The ChinCom response to date has been to try to build new cities to accommodate them, hence the radical price changes in copper, iron, and cement over the past couple of years.

Won't work, of course -- CAN'T work -- but the ChinComs apparently are unaware of John Galt's statement to Mr. Thompson.

I've no idea -- certainly hope not! -- that the rural peasants will be mowed down by the PLA on their masters' orders, but I rather think this won't come to pass. Perhaps an incident or two, but no more.

The ChinComs are taking the short end of history, both their own nation's history and that of other nations to boot. This has hardly ever been a winning proposition. Ask Chirac for further details (assuming he's even READ his own nation's history). Or ask the Romanovs, whatever's left of them. Or the pre-Chavez ruling party in Venezuela.

Point is that when a nation gets stuck with SO MANY illiterate peasants who become discontented with being illiterate peasants and WITHOUT bothering to become literate, the sequel is potentially more volatile than mercury fulminate.

Exactly where China is, just this moment.

18 posted on 01/28/2006 12:33:01 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson