[frankjr]

- "the New York Times reporter who disclosed the NSA program"

- "A Washington Post story published this past weekend reported on how we use "link analysis" to connect one terrorist to another"

Prosecute and punish these national security comprimising reporters, managing editors and publishers.

[Blood of Tyrants]

The 'Rats have invented a new style of government. They call it a "hypocracy".

[Shery]

Just pray for justice to be done. God is not deaf!

[RedEyeJack]

Again, it looks like time for the administration to reluctantly request a "special" Declaration of War that can be used to criminalize such activities. Not doing so looks increasingly like we are not serious about fighting the terrorists.

[Logical me]

Does anyone think the Republicans know how to fight? The real wimps are the Republicans and the RATS are the heroes of the nation.

You see, what they, the RATS, do is dream up scenarios which do not have any substance of truth and put them on a list. They as soon as one fades, doing damage, they resurrect next on the list. Thats why the order of these attacks seems puzzling. Nothing has to be true or have any reality, but it is just keep hammering away with this crap. The co-conspirator is the MSM who are guilty as hell. Then they cause a congressional hearing so they can vent anything but very little on the subject of the hearing. Maybe you have noticed, but the hearings on the RAT side is just 90% speaking and never really ask a questing. And if they do, they cut off the person in the hot seat.

This is typical of sick people. Mentally ill can devise all kinds of tricks and they know if you throw enough shi@ at a wall, lots will stick and put doubt in the minds of many unbalanced citizens of the nation. What I am sick of is the Republicans are too dumb to fight back with the same methods, but we have real cases of fraud, lies, deceit, etc. This may not seem much on the Libby subject, but Libby was caught up in one of the RAT scenarios. And it will destroy much of him.

[Purrcival]

"Prosecute and punish these national security comprimising reporters, managing editors and publishers."

That's a BIG 10-4 to that, brother!

[shield]

bttt

[Rick_Michael]

Transperacy is good, but it depends on the situation. If they have a method which proves to be effective in stopping the enemy...whom am I or who is the press to release that information.

Imagine if one of our intelligience agents or the press of world war 2 told the Japanese we knew their code very early on in the war. Do you think the war would have had more deaths and could have been longer?

Why not just tell the enemy everything we know about them, so they can evade us, and have more of a chance to kill us...is that the kind of society we are?

Al Pacino said it best (about these rats):

Their spirit is dead; if they ever had one, it's gone. You're building a rat ship here. A vessel for sea going snitches. And if you think your preparing these minnows for manhood you better think again. Because I say you are killing the very spirit this institution proclaims it instills. What a sham! What kind of show are you guys puttin' on here today. I mean, the only class in this act is sittin' next to me. And I say, this boy's soul is in tact. It is non-negotiable. You know how I know. Because someone here--I'm not gonna say who--offered to buy it. Only Charlie here wasn't selling.