Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Judith) MILLER FIGHTS SUBPOENA (For 2001 tipoff to Al Qaeda fundraisers)
NY Post ^ | 2/14/06 | KATI CORNELL SMITH

Posted on 02/14/2006 4:26:09 AM PST by jimbo123

Former New York Times reporter Judith Miller turned up at a federal appeals court in Manhattan yesterday for arguments over whether the feds have a right to subpoena her phone records as part of a probe into Islamic charities and terror financing.

The New York Times is seeking to stop authorities from gaining access to records for calls that Miller and another reporter, Philip Shenon, made to sources in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; aidandcomfort; alqaeda; banglist; cialeak; collaborators; judithmiller; nra; nytimes; philipshenon; saboteurs; secondamendment; traitormedia; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
The NY Times can't hide from their treasonous support for Al Qaeda.
1 posted on 02/14/2006 4:26:11 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I'm beginning to wonder if her seperation from the Times was more of a self-preservation move (for the Times) than it was for stated differences.


2 posted on 02/14/2006 4:28:24 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Note: MSM BLACKOUT on Judith Miller's new subpoena for tipping off Al Qaeda fundraisers to an upcoming FBI raid so they could destroy documents. Only the NY Post is carrying the story.


3 posted on 02/14/2006 4:35:24 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

CONTACT the NY Times public editor and ask him why they're not reporting the news they've they've been subpoenaed over their raid tipoff to Al Qaeda fundraisers.

• E-mail: public@nytimes.com
• Phone: (212) 556-7652


4 posted on 02/14/2006 4:41:23 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
for calls that Miller and another reporter, Philip Shenon, made to sources in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

'Must be nice to have connections.

5 posted on 02/14/2006 4:42:26 AM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

This stuff just gets better every day!


6 posted on 02/14/2006 4:46:20 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
And you wanna know something else? There's a certain name that pops up in this case too......

Page 13

On December 3, 2001, consistent with
The Times’ policy of seeking comment from the subjects of its articles,
Miller telephoned HLF (Holy Land Foundation) and spoke with HLF
representatives about the information that had been disclosed to
her by one or more confidential sources. According to Miller, she
sought comment from HLF at this time only "about the government’s
intent to block HLF’s assets," and she did not intend to tip-off HLF
about the impending FBI search of HLF’s offices.
Patrick J.
Fitzgerald
, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
("Fitzgerald"), representing the government, has stated that on the
night of December 3, 2001, Miller disclosed to HLF personnel that "government action was imminent"
(Affirmation of Patrick J. Fitzgerald, dated Nov. 19, 2004, and that
the HLF personnel were surprised by the information conveyed by Miller.
According to Miller, "[t]hat government action was taken against [HLF]
did not come as a surprise to even a casual observer."

THE NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. ALBERTO GONZALES 2-24-05

7 posted on 02/14/2006 4:49:40 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil

Miller, Shenon and the NY Times don't want to give up their Justice Department sources who told her about the upcoming raid on the Al Qaeda fundraisers.

Miller's tip to the terrorists allowed them to destroy thousands of documents and computer files before the FBI was able to secure their offices.


8 posted on 02/14/2006 4:52:20 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
I'm glad to see the Feds are appealing this. A lower court judge ruled in February that the phone records were "protected," but legal experts felt it wouldn't stand up to appeal.

Miller tipped off the Holy Land Foundation before the post-9/11 FBI raid, and Shenon tipped off the Global Relief Foundation.

I would consider trying to find the source of those "tips" far more important than whether Valerie Plame was/wasn't/could be/should be an undercover agent

9 posted on 02/14/2006 5:00:42 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad

I bet this new development won't be on Chris Matthews tonight. The NY Times today is defending in court their right to tipoff Al Qaeda terror financiers based on tips from pro-terrorist sources in the Justice Department.


10 posted on 02/14/2006 5:07:47 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: OXENinFLA
On December 3, 2001, consistent with The Times’ policy of seeking comment from the subjects of its articles, Miller telephoned HLF (Holy Land Foundation) and spoke with HLF representatives about the information that had been disclosed to her by one or more confidential sources. According to Miller, she sought comment from HLF at this time only "about the government’s intent to block HLF’s assets," and she did not intend to tip-off HLF about the impending FBI search of HLF’s offices.

So she admits to being criminally stupid? Sounds like a clear-cut case of obstruction of justice. Why isn't she back in the slammer?

12 posted on 02/14/2006 5:35:37 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
I'm beginning to wonder if her seperation from the Times was more of a self-preservation move (for the Times) than it was for stated differences.

It's what Rush has been saying all along.

13 posted on 02/14/2006 5:40:12 AM PST by American in Singapore (Liberals: Their ignorance and stupidity is becoming dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: American in Singapore

Unfortunately, I can't get Rush in the office, and hear him once in a very blue moon.


14 posted on 02/14/2006 5:43:06 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Well, then let me say: Bright minds think alike!


15 posted on 02/14/2006 5:46:51 AM PST by American in Singapore (Liberals: Their ignorance and stupidity is becoming dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Got to wonder if McCain's anti-torture amendment was a protection for the pressitutes, his most important constituency.
16 posted on 02/14/2006 5:48:19 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
I would consider trying to find the source of those "tips" far more important than whether Valerie Plame was/wasn't/could be/should be an undercover agent.

The fact that Patrick Fitzgerald spent over two years on what everyone on the Net knew to be a no-brainer about Plame, now clearly shows what a Smoke Screen it was.

17 posted on 02/14/2006 5:49:08 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
And you wanna know something else? There's a certain name that pops up in this case too......

There was a very popular theory here that Fitz's deal with Miller in the Libby case had to do with her Holy Land testimony. I researched it at the time, and have known since then that the government appeal (re: the Holy Land subpoena) was pending.

But Fitz's attachment to this case should not come as a surprise, I guess is my point.

18 posted on 02/14/2006 5:52:16 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
MSM BLACKOUT on Judith Miller's new subpoena for tipping off Al Qaeda fundraisers to an upcoming FBI raid so they could destroy documents.

Old subpoena. She fought it and won in District Court. The government appealed, and that appeal is pending.

19 posted on 02/14/2006 5:53:19 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Background, case links, etc. at ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1494693/posts?page=16#16
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1494693/posts?page=24#24

20 posted on 02/14/2006 5:56:24 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson